year reporting about a campaign to influence supreme court justices, buying buildings across from the court and now this. i mean if the public was already disenchanted with the court wondering if something s up with the court maybe this is not the neutral arbiter we thought it was, this is not going to help, and it s not going to make john roberts job as chief justice the steward of the court s institutional legitimacy any easier. $1.6 billion. thank you for your time tonight. thank you for your outrage with me. i need it. coming up, i took a trip down to the sunshine state over the weekend and i m going to give you a sneak peek coming up next. m going to give you a sneak peek coming up next or you could see, everything that could be. go. baker tilly.
as legitimate if they were to investigate this kind of behavior. i mean, leonard leo reaped a $1.6 billion wind fall from a single donor in what is likely the biggest single political gift in u.s. history. he s getting $1.6 billion at the same time that the supreme court now focused there is issuing some of the most conservative opinions it ever has and reshaping american life. now, $1.6 billion is a hefty price tag, but if you think about what they re getting for their money potentially i mean do you think there s going to be any oversight of the court, of what leo s doing? i mean what is the road forward here and what seem so questionable at least on the outside? i think every time i appear on this show to talk with you about the supreme court i always wind up saying at some point this has got to be a really bad day for john g. roberts, the chief justice of the united states who more than anyone views himself as the institutional steward of the court. this is terrible for the cou
0 brown of ohio, thank you so much. chris, thank you, always. that is all in on this wednesday night. alex wagner tonight starts right now, good evening, alex. what is happened in the railroad companies. we all experts of the efficiency mechanisms of employed in the last decade. the stock buyback. it s exactly what, one of the things that happen in covid. system running in the background you don t think about. how did the chemical get across the country? the whole system of that. purplepurple around the country and powerful systems that want the public to pay for the risk as much as possible operating thin background and then a disaster happens between a potential rail strike and this accident it s blown the whole thing open and we re acutely aware of all the risks involved thanks to you at home for joining us tonight do you remember this photo the iconic image of classified documents splayed out on the floor of donald trump s mar-a-lago home after the fbi searched it las
god is ever present for those of us who understand the omnipotent god in ourselves and i am grateful for the supreme court who recognized above the shouting of anger and violence against the sick that they were willing to uphold the constitution that allowed us to send young boys to war. allowed us to tax even the poorest. if we undermined the infrastructure of the commerce clause, the government would not exist. so i humbly stand here today feeling a sense that my pain has been overcome and my mother who died as a vocational nurse who lived afterwards with a sickness that was kronnic and if we did not have universal medicare for those over the age of 65, they would lay dead in their graves even before they could see their grandchildren. i stand here today in closing by saying that america is a great country. democrats were willing to sacrifice and lose in 2010 because we believe in the humanity of all women kind and mankind. thank god. thank america, thank the constitution a
mr. garre. mr. garre: thank you, mr. chief justice, and may it please the court: two factors distinguish this case from those in which the court has found cause lacking to excuse a default: first, the state itself had a direct hand in the extraordinary events leading up to the default in this case; and second, the actions of maples attorneys, which rise to the level of abandonment, are not attributable to maples under agency law or other principles that this court has invoked in determining when attorney conduct may be imputed to a client. that this court has invoked in determining when conduct can be with a client. it the default at issue in this case is not fairly attributable to cory maples. the decision of the 11th circuit should be reversed. for either or both of those reasons, the default at issue in this case is not fairly attributable to cory maples and the contrary decision of the eleventh circuit should be reversed. chief justice john g. roberts: you talk about the