Then lastly, we all know that research that the money we invest in our young kids is basically pays humongous dividends at the end of the day. The last person that gave Public Comments asked a question, did you get to hear that . I think you have answers for that, would you like to address the issue of how do you monitor this business of these programs . Interview thank you supervisor. Again director of the office early care and education and in response to the question what committees are oversight do we have for this work of oec generally and im pleased to say we have a ninemember Citizens Advisory Committee seated half by the mayor and half by the board of supervisors of qualified parents and practitioners to help advise our work and provide accountability and Program Improvements for the City Investments and Early Childhood to make sure that theyre working as well as they can for both parents and programs. They meet by monthly and where data informed and also advise outside of meet
Due just have more kids when you have the teacher, like some afternoon programs in the past depending on the structure you could have 30, 50 kids it doesnt matter and so that could lower the cost and just charge the parents more. Right, followup on the question, first it has to do with the ratio of the number of educators to children and talk about quality, thats a really important component of quality to have the right level of supervision and support at a health and safety measure and also the level support to facilitate learning to be september 11th. We support the handful very small number of facilities that have infant toddler care and i believe it to be two and we support that work and theyre primarily a preschool provider given the way they organize the history but they do support infant and toddler care toddlers and some of their classrooms and theyre part of our system and they receive city funding and they are also great contribute ors and that question about quality in addit
Public comment is closed. Commissioner richards. Just a few questions, please. The taxable retail sales do they include online sales of city businesses that ship somewhere else . Online sales for city businesses that ship somewhere else . Buy someone online from the Company Based in San Francisco. Physical sales at a physical location. I believe its based on its sales tax that is collected in San Francisco. So it could be online sales too. I dont know if its delivered to somewhere that is not within San Francisco, im not sure, but i can get back to you. The reason im asking you is we have businesses that come before us. They are requesting conditional use authorizations if they are formula retail and we talk about the tipping points between food and beverage and retail. I think this is really really good starting point, but really trying to understand, the revenue is way up; right . But what i am hearing out in the neighborhoods are costs are way up too, and vacancy rates. Its hard to
One we think that ultimately even though this exceeds the targets that we saw in proposition k, we think its a valuable use of the asset of the city to try to sort of engineer change in the boder market, demonstrate opportunities and really figure out what he can do to sort of super Housing Construction in the areas that hasnt been as robust as the market rated sector. I wanted to reiterate the point earlier, through this analytical process, our work determines that a site is not a good fit for housing and the exampling that was brought up to us in a per pdr district, i think we see beneficial reuse opportunities as benefiting the city atlarge and the city could coordinate with the owner agency to make that happen obviously through community en[tkpwaeuplts ] and engagement with the policymakers. So were not leaving aside everything that isnt housing, but at same time we want to be clear that sour focus and our driving energy towards how we pull together projects under this program. I w
See 50 of the units under this program be affordable to low and moderate income as defined by the way i just did. So lowincome is below 60 moderate many income below 120 one we think that ultimately even though this exceeds the targets that we saw in proposition k, we think its a valuable use of the asset of the city to try to sort of engineer change in the boder market, demonstrate opportunities and really figure out what he can do to sort of super Housing Construction in the areas that hasnt been as robust as the market rated sector. I wanted to reiterate the point earlier, through this analytical process, our work determines that a site is not a good fit for housing and the exampling that was brought up to us in a per pdr district, i think we see beneficial reuse opportunities as benefiting the city atlarge and the city could coordinate with the owner agency to make that happen obviously through community en[tkpwaeuplts ] and engagement with the policymakers. So were not leaving asi