Weekend and its the worst of all networks. When i look adat the hostility of that, i said lets do it with another network. I want to do it, so were thinking about it. They also want to change the rules. The deal is we keep the same rules and they want to change the rules because she cant answer questions. As donald trump casting doubt about whether hell participate in the president ial debate scheduled from two weeks from today, well have the latest on the rift over the rules from the two campaigns. Also ahead, an update on the classified documents case against former President Trump as jack smith works to reverse judge Aileen Cannons dismissal. And well go through the growing list of republicans who are now supporting Vice President Harris Campaign. Good morning and welcome to way too early on this tuesday, august 27th. Im ali vitali in for jonathan lemire. We begin with the fight between the harris and Trump Campaigns over the rules for the president ial debate. The main issue is whe
Well get started. Good morning, everyone ip im elizabeth slattery, legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation and this is a panel on the past Supreme Court term. So the Supreme Courts next oh, im sorry. The top one . Okay, there we go. The Supreme Courts next term starts . Just a few weeks but were here to reflect on the past term. I submit that the october term 2018 will more likely be remembered for Justice Brett kavanaughs confirmation hearings than for any particular case the court decided, and its too early to make sweeping statements about the impact of president Donald Trumps nominees to the court, though the rapid destruction of america, their opponents foresaw has yet to occur. Justices Brett Kavanaugh and neil gorsuch have however lived up to the chief justices declaration that we do not have obama judges or trump judges, bush judges or clinton judges. Like their predecessors, kavanaugh and gorsuch are their own men at times bucking expectations of how a trump judge will vote. T
Journal live at 7 00 eastern friday morning per join the discussion. Friday morning. On the discussion. With the next Supreme Court term scheduled to begin october 7, panel of legal experts review the courts most recent term and preview the next term. Speakers analyze the Court Rulings on gerrymandering, Citizenship Question on the senses, other major cases involving freespeech and prison sentencing. The American Political Science Association hosts this 90minute event. We will go ahead and get started. Im elizabeth slattery, legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation. The past panel on Supreme Court term. The Supreme Courts next oops, im sorry. The top one . There we go. The Supreme Courts term starts in a few weeks, but we are here to reflect on the past term. I submit the october term 2018 will most likely be remembered for Justice Brett kavanaughs confirmation hearings than for any particular case the court decided. It is too early to make sweeping statements about the impact of Presid
Will most likely be remembered for Justice Brett kavanaughs confirmation hearings than for any particular case the court decided. It is too early to make sweeping statements about the impact of President Trumps nominees to the court, though the rapid destruction of america their opponents foresaw has yet to occur. Justices Brett Kavanaugh and neil gorsuch have, however lived , up to the chief justices declaration that we do not have obama judges or trump judges, bush edges or clinton judges. Like their predecessors, kavanaugh and gorsuch are their own men at times bucking , expectations of how a trump judge will vote. They are not cookiecutter republicans, but thoughtful jurists with independent views of the law. And we will explore some of that today. This panel will focus on the term thes of the past , most important cases such as the census citizenship case and the political gerrymandering case, and a few missed opportunities, like the cases involving the nondelegation doctrine and
Out front tonight, putin breaks his silence, speaking for the first time publicly since december. Putin taking questions during a meeting with ironically a nato country, claiming the United States has broken its word and is forcing his hand in ukraine. There are mk41 launchers on which tomahawks can be installed. That is, these are not antimissile but strike systems that will cover our territory for thousands of kilometers. Isnt that a threat to us . Let us imagine ukraine is a nato member and stuffed with weapons and there are State Of The Art Missile Systems like in poland and romania, who will stop nit crimea, let alone dumbas, a russian sovereign territory. Let us imagine ukraine is a nato member and venture such as combat operations. Are we supposed to be at war with nato . His demands have not changed, trickling down, crimea was originally annexed by russia. No one has done much about it. Which remains the reason why putin believes he can control more of ukraine. Here is somethin