[applause] it is pretty astounding the turnout which i am guess saying today i wonder if you could articulate the criteria for your choices and if there is an opportunity for either/or both for you read a piece of the letters? .xd .xdçó so, there was no criteria, so except that they were community builders and someone had an id that and believe it. none of the books were cookie cutter. and the letter could have started out any way that it wanted to start out because we did want to have control over that. we held the same policy with reference to the letters that we received. we did very little with those letters, a commack here, and i learned how did hate the comma in some respects. people use, mack s and the craziest ways. so we did not fool around with the letters. occasionally be might see a word i remember distinctly somebody use the word begins and i thought they meant beckons. so, i called them and i forget who it was but she was absolutely stunned. she said you all
will lead to? guest: i am an optimist and think ultimately the people will win out. damages being done to the credibility of the iranian regime even if they can hold on. they are weakened. the impulse for freedom is strengthened. i would hope than that even if they do not win this time congress has passed them money in the last few years to help encourage the people. i am optimistic although i fear the price that people will have to pay on the streets of tehran and in other cities before the get their freedom. host: we are going back and forth in domestic issues. this tweet says the public plan may work like the post office. guest: it depends how it is structured, how the senate committees and senator baucus and the opposition and other members of congress do with this. there is no plan, by the way. no one has a plan. there is a lot of good talk but no one has presented a plan. concerning the federal program, all i am saying is that you had a choice of what health care prov
at a merger acquisition? under the statute, the fcc looks at mergers through the public interest standard. and that s really our only hook and again, that s a merge wrer there s a transfer of licenses. if there s no transfer of license, it doesn t come before us. we have a different standard from the department of justice or the federal trade commission might. so the public interest standard is broad, but it s also within our core mission, obviously, that congress set up in 1934. so going forward, i like to look at mergers and any conditions that are placed on them. and i ask the question, whether or not those conditions are merger specific. is there something that s coming out of there regarding maybe a competitive harm that s merger specific and we place conditions on that that are sort of narrowly tailored to those interests. so that is historically how i ve done things. sometimes a majority of the commission might see it a different way and they work out a different dea
it became a galvanizing symbol for the environmental movement, one of the handful of disasters that led to the creation of the epa. a spark plug for the environmental reforms around the country. a national punchline that would endure for decades. the city has worked to reclaim its river. today is home to more than 60 species of fish. details from inside of the from inside of the new york times this morning. republican line, good morning. caller: good morning. and good to see people standing up for freedom after democrats tried to stop freedom. a coward like obama should not have anything to say about this. he never held anyone to have freedom. not even the american baby. he and slaves, tortures, murders the american baby, just like all of these cowards every day. if democrats tried to help, they would quit right now in the middle. those cowards. what is the problem? cowards. that is what democrats best bar at, being cowards. host: a look at what you should be reading thi