Discussed in beijing. You said in the case of the president s tweets that this on going investigation, more things will come out when theyve made that. The collusion charges. All the people in the investigation there. Why in one case is that sufficient to say there is no collusion now, versus the others need more information coming out . Because, again, i think theres a difference. Im not ruling anything out. Im merely explaining that every person, republican, democrat, obama, the Obama Administration across the broad section. In terms of what . On the investigation itself, we know from the people who have been briefed on the other piece of it, we know its an on going thing. Even according to the department of justice in terms of the information thats been provided and chairman nunes, that they are still at the beginning of this process. That is a very different thing than a group of people saying theres an on going investigation and from what weve been briefed, there is no evidence to
Alongside respected seafood supplier Fins’ new shop, the precinct will be welcoming Venn Bicton, a specialty coffee outlet selling its own beans in bulk alongside great bagels and coffee.
do it. dana: what is your experience and now your gut instinct tell you about where possible legislation is going? i think it s unlikely at the federal level that there s no chance of an assault weapons ban. last time this came up in 2004, it was defeated in the senate by a vote i think of 90-8. there was overwhelming lack of enthusiasm. remember, columbine happened midway through the experiment with an assault weapons ban. dana: yeah, 99. 1999. the assault weapons ban basically said we re going to take guns that look dangerous when in reality, every gun is dangerous. i think there s a good chance if people stay focused on this of having the cordin murphy bill. this is sponsored by john cordin, by chris murray to fix the problems and the national crime registries so law enforcement has this is
back to justice ruth bader ginsberg s confirmation hearing. mike emanuel joins me live from outside the gorsuch hearing room on capitol hill. mike, any references so far to that ginsberg rule? dana, as a matter of fact, yes. texas senator john cordin said it would be wrong to have judge gorsuch weigh in on potential cases and potentially prejudge those cases. he made reference to justice ginsberg by name. we re not here to ask you, even though some might, how you will vote in specific cases. ruth bader ginsberg said a judge can offer no forecast, no hints, for that would not only show disregard for the specifics of a particular case, it would display disdain for the entire judicial process. senator cornin said, he does expect some of his colleagues to try to ask questions to draw judge gorsuch out.
often and so early to their own private residence. president bush went to crawford. not as often. i get it. but at the same time, the president is very clear that he works seven days a week. this is where he goes to see his family. he brings people down there. there is part of being president. john? thank you, sean. turning back to the meet with chancellor merkel on friday, did the president and the chancellor discuss the economic crisis at all? given the appointments of two officials to the treasury department who have been critical of the international monetary fund, does the administration see new or different role for the imf in resolving the economic crisis. let me refer you to the treasury department and imf. the readout that we provided on the chancellor s visit, excuse me, speaks for itself. they spoke at length as far as what they discussed and what