Significant changed we feel that was is proposed particularly what the 2 foot additional reduction on the back provides greater relieve to the appellants property still some impacts but the changes try to mitigate that from the group form previously reviewed i think that was a challenging project to refugee that thats youre seeing that here today before you and there are challenging issues to address the commission and as a Zoning Administrator we did our best job is he discretionary review to weigh through the teller material with a balanced condition thats ruled in the project before you today and we look forward to hearing our comments and direction on the project ill be happy to answer any questions. I have a question about the historical significance of this it wasnt clear if it is qualified is it on the register is the standard would you enlighten. It met the secretary of interior standards and the project compiles with the preservation concerns to the building was listed as a ca
Letter and so has former jane and margaret head of the family and child serviced was appalled moving on a number of concessions over 10 you can look at page 12 in my briefly youll go over a few to create less shadow the upper floor the appellant has been set back 6 feet plus and windows on that side have been made clearly with fills of 6 feet home was reduced by 3 feet several years ago in negotiation and more recently rutsz under 14 inches move forward 2 feet and move forward 3 foot before the commission took action overwhelmingly our clients wanted the secondstory not 80 moved at all the appellant minded they were 13 and ended up with 5 its a reasonable compromise youll hear why much more if any will cost a lot of money when mr. Shapz talks to you theres no rear yard open space in the rear the blocks come together you could point your fingers at a acute angle the open space youre looking at it is now there are 4 homelands on 24 by one hundred rear lots and not coming at strange under
And margaret head of the family and child serviced was appalled moving on a number of concessions over 10 you can look at page 12 in my briefly youll go over a few to create less shadow the upper floor the appellant has been set back 6 feet plus and windows on that side have been made clearly with fills of 6 feet home was reduced by 3 feet several years ago in negotiation and more recently rutsz under 14 inches move forward 2 feet and move forward 3 foot before the commission took action overwhelmingly our clients wanted the secondstory not 80 moved at all the appellant minded they were 13 and ended up with 5 its a reasonable compromise youll hear why much more if any will cost a lot of money when mr. Shapz talks to you theres no rear yard open space in the rear the blocks come together you could point your fingers at a acute angle the open space youre looking at it is now there are 4 homelands on 24 by one hundred rear lots and not coming at strange understandably not a open space in
Concessions over 10 you can look at page 12 in my briefly youll go over a few to create less shadow the upper floor the appellant has been set back 6 feet plus and windows on that side have been made clearly with fills of 6 feet home was reduced by 3 feet several years ago in negotiation and more recently rutsz under 14 inches move forward 2 feet and move forward 3 foot before the commission took action overwhelmingly our clients wanted the secondstory not 80 moved at all the appellant minded they were 13 and ended up with 5 its a reasonable compromise youll hear why much more if any will cost a lot of money when mr. Shapz talks to you theres no rear yard open space in the rear the blocks come together you could point your fingers at a acute angle the open space youre looking at it is now there are 4 homelands on 24 by one hundred rear lots and not coming at strange understandably not a open space in the mid enclosing block the Zoning Administrator said in 2003 quote the exposed buildi