For the u. S. Theres a guy on social media pretty well connected to the military about what the president might be talking about is a Counter Attack on niger where we lost these three special u. S. Operators this week. I called one individual who is usually pretty connected and said, any upcoming attacks we dont know about. Have you been running the traps . Ive been focusing on the mueller, trump news tonight. Its remarkable there are so many possibilities. North korea, iran, yemen. Were taking Military Action in countries around the world where we havent been before. Theyre leaning on the balls of their feet. People are wondering whats next. I think thats why people were so concerned when they backed away and looked at the substance of what was said. Counselor, help us turn the corner into the mueller investigation. Muellers associates have found the author of the dossier. We learned this after they havent found it nor he is cooperating with them. Does the mueller team get to be the f
pulled back, agreed to enrich below the 3.67% level. all of these things make them actually not able to do a nuclear warhead. if we had that deal with north korea ten years ago, north korea wouldn t have a nuclear warhead. i think and, again, joe mentioned, people like chuck schumer against the deal now came over. i think people will be reluctant to dessert phi it. we will be going against our allies, the p 5 plus one. england, france, russia signed off on this, china signed off on this. this would make us so untrustworthy on the international stage. by the way, it will signal to north korea, why should i trust you guys if you want to denuclear rise our country if you through ew it over with ira if you re right and he s going to do this against a pile of evidence and all the aides in this area around him, that takes a pile of acquiescence. i get it that there s just one boss in the west wing, but
too late. bomb scare, the history of nuclear weapons. and deadly ars nals. he s a romantic comedy writer. rick stengel from the state department and as well as former managing editor of time magazine. gentleman, welcome. joe, i d like to begin with you. what was the president basing that criticism on low these many months? do you think he actually did a granular deconstruction of the iran deal or who had his ear question one. question two is, for americans smart enough to be watching this broadcast tonight, what s in it for them? why should they if your view is support the iran deal? brian, it would be very interesting to know if the president understands what s in the iran deal. if somebody were to ask him to describe it, because it s very hard to believe that the president would disagree with a deal that required iran to
think i ve ever seen. as far as iran is concerned, i think they are doing a tremendous disservice to an agreement that was signed. it was a terrible agreement. it shouldn t have been signed. it shouldn t have been negotiated. i m all for agreements but that was a bad one. as bad as i ve ever seen negotiated. the iran deal was one of the worst and most one-sided transactions the united states has ever entered into. frankly, that deal is an embarrassment to the united states. well, now there s this. ann gearan of the washington post says president trump plans to announce that he will dessert phi the international nuclear deal saying it is not in the national interest of the united states and kicking the issue to a reluctant congress. people briefed on an emerging white house economy said thursday. joining me, joe serincioni and the author of three books pertinent to this conversation and they are nuclear nightmare,
pulled back, agreed to enrich below the 3.67% level. all of these things make them actually not able to do a nuclear warhead. if we had that deal with north korea ten years ago, north korea wouldn t have a nuclear warhead. i think and, again, joe mentioned, people like chuck schumer against the deal now came over. i think people will be reluctant to dessert phi it. we will be going against our allies, the p 5 plus one. england, france, russia signed off on this, china signed off on this. this would make us so untrustworthy on the international stage. by the way, it will signal to north korea, why should i trust you guys if you want to denuclear rise our country if you threw it over with iran. if you re right and he s going to do this against a pile of evidence and all the aides in this area around him, that takes a pile of acquiescence.