Thats not true. He said it was an amazing outcome, talking about what the Vice President went over and did and what he did. He said it was a ceasefire. The turks call it a pause. He said and then he said it was a ceasefire and a pause, and there was more fighting. They kept bombing. Just this morning. Yeah. Heres what i need to know. Maybe you have the answer. That would be great. Why did he do it at the time that he did it in and in the way that he did it . I get wanting troops out. I get that whole argument. After that call with erdogan, after erdogan met with putin, why did the president do this this way with all the resistance that went along with it . Thats what we need to know. Well, if i could answer that question, i would not be sitting here. I would be on an island somewhere, you know, like jeff bezos or something because id be able to predict everything. But i do have a notion, an idea if you really want to know the truth, maybe you should start with nancy pelosi, who says al
Her claims. Whats next in the Ongoing Court case . But first we begin with an exclusive report from nbc news about some of the 65 hours of closeddoor testimony given to the house impeachment committees by Trump Administration officials. Nbc news reports at least three current and former u. S. Officials have all made the same startling admission, a coveted white house visit for the new ukrainian leader had been explicitly conditioned on his agreeing to investigations that could have helped President Trumps reelection. And when Gordon Sondland was asked pointblank under oath whether that constituted a quid pro quo, he did not dispute it, people with knowledge of his testimony said. Nbc news reports that, thanks to testimony like this and thanks to Public Comments from trump, his aides, and his allies, quote, a portrait is emerging of a quid pro quo that evolved over time when the president progressively upping the ante when his demands were not met. This Development Comes on the heels of
The. Announcer this is new day weekend with Victor Blackwell and christie. Good morning. Were following the scandal and impeachment inquiry of President Trump. Within just the past 13 hours secretary of state pompeo has been told to turn over documents. Hes already missed two deadlines. His third and final chance to hand them other. The special envoy to ukraine is out of a job. He resigned yesterday. The whistleblower complaint says he was advised how to deal with President Trump and his personal attorney rudy julyulia he said he was not concerned because, quote, the u. S. Had done the same thing in other countries. The president s phone call with the ukraine president may not have been the only one the white house wanted to keep quiet. Sources say details of conversations with other World Leaders including Vladimir Putin were subject to tighter than normal restrictions in terms of those transcripts and where they would be revealed. Some of those transcripts, in fact, werent even circu
I told a viewer last night about what to look for, look for the substance not the distractions. But there was so many distractions. Im not a rocket scientist. Everyone knew they were go doing it but some of the folks questioning, especially on the republican side, i kept say doing you have a question . Do you have a question . And most was not on the substance of what the witnesses were saying, it was on the process and things that happened before and really i think conspiracy theories that most of the American People had nev heard of. Some a very niche fringe. The idea that ukrain and not russia is who interfered in 2016 is poppycock and some of making the arguments know that. Theyre just playing an advantage. And its not i agree with the one of the guests you had on earlier from new york one. Errol lewis. And im getting old. But i dont think i think yes, this is about the American Public. But i dont think you should judge the content of what was said oro the News Coverage or the valu
Longer there involved in allegedly altering some type of document. No indication that that actually would have swayed the judge or the court or the actual substance of that document, but nevertheless, this will be fodder for the president , and then also an issue of one of the people that the president and his allies slammed for quite some. I. Bruce ohr, doj lawyer, the New York Times saying hes expected to be criticizing for operating without knowledge of his superiors. I look at this reporting, appears as though this is going to really undercut some of the main criticisms from the president there was a deep cabal, deep state to do speak inside the fbi works against him. Josh and jennifer, stand by. Let me get more news in. Also from the New York Times today, the paper is breaking a story on the president s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani. His dealings in ukraine, at the heart of the impeachment inquiry. The New York Times reports this afternoon that as giuliani was pressuring the Ukr