that s when he was asked. he said i didn t know my son was under investigation. garbage. not true. and you are now yeah, what am i now? engaging about all kinds of fantasies about the president when there s clear proof about a democrat and you can t handle it. how about we go to china when you flew his son there on air force two and eight days later listen, rudy, i don t know what any of this has to do with what i ve been asking you about tonight. i ve got to be honesty. it has to do with how unfair you are. it s unfair for me not to want to tolerate you talking about joe biden all night long when we have an inspector general fighting with the dni, fighting with congress over a whistleblower complaint that involves this president and you and what you ve been doing playing with ukraine. we have an anonymous whistleblower complaint compared to clear proof that biden s son iervegs got to go, rudy. got $1.5 billion from china and you won t cover it. tell me you re n
about it, and that s fine. i m not saying that it doesn t deserve discussion. will you please answer my question. let s talk like lawyers for a minute. okay, respect this lawyer consider rudy, i don t want to go down a rabbit hole. i taught law. you re going to listen. if i offer something of value to someone in return for their official action. joe biden offered $1.2 billion loan guarantee in return for him firing a prosecutor. you have proof that it was a quid pro quo situation and you can show it? yeah. you know what the proof is? joe biden, 2018 january in front of the council on foreign relations saying the whole thing. he said i m going to give you this money if you get rid of this prosecutor? 100%. exactly. send me the transcript. go listen to it and apologize to me. go listen to it. he said exactly that but he lets one thing out. he left out the fact that his son was under investigation. isn t that the important thing because he needed to have a motive i
want to hear from me. if you don t want to hear from me, just cut me off. no, i will never cut you off. go ahead. the fact what you re saying to me is completely equivalent what joe biden admitted on tape two years ago and you didn t cover, which is i told the president of the ukraine you re not going to get your $1.2 billion unless you fire the prosecutor. how come you didn t cover that? how come i wasn t called on here the night that that happened? because you re not fair. you re not fair in your coverage. okay. would you please recognize that. now, i ll tell you about trump, right? go ahead. i have no knowledge that the president ever said anything i don t even know about the $250 million. okay. in aid. i have no knowledge of that. i just know about various meetings. when you re done i ll tell you why i m asking. but the reality is that the president of the united states, whoever he is, has every right to tell the president of another country you better straigh
reported is true, it doesn t make a damn it doesn t make any difference. if the president of the united states said to the president of the ukraine investigate the corruption in your country that has a bearing on our 2016 election, isn t that what he s supposed to do? unless you assume that the president is guilty as opposed to the fact that those people in the ukraine were trying to frame the president, which is exactly what they were doing. what if he said i have $250 million that you want. if he said that? why don t you investigate what s happening with joe biden and what s happening with what he did to me and i ll give you the 250? isn t that exactly what joe biden did and admitted on tape in 2018? so you wait a second, chris. stop. you think it was wrong? you asked me a question. you ve got to take the answer. no, i don t have to take it. you can t run in an opposite direction about joe biden every time i ask you about the instant case. i m making a point i
another excuse. i m very interested in your personal insults of me. we can meet some other time and you can say it face to face. i m not insulting you, chris. i m institutionally insulting you because your coverage is horrendous. it s so unfair and it shocks me as a person who fought for justice his whole life. it gets called into question as what you ve been doing as counsel in this case. i ve been representing my client in the best spirit and in the best way that i can do as a lawyer and i vindicated him. and now i am proving that what happened to him was a frame-up. you didn t vindicate him. you kept him out of the chair. you kept him out of the chair with mueller and that was the best thing you did and that was a great move. and you know what you re going to find out? it was ukrainian collusion with hillary clinton that she paid $1.5 million for and the joe biden family has been selling you want do give me the proof, that s fine. i don t have to give you the proof