Joined by nathan holman, one of the architects of the paris accord and the obama administration, you watched that, what did you make of it . Trump made a case about fairness and in that sense i thought it was relative to the facts of what the Paris Agreement actually is. I thought it was borderline delusional and apocalyptic. Those are strong words, back them up. He sketched a vision of what the Paris Accord Is Asa kind vision of what the paris accord is as a kind of International Imposition of the United States put it was negotiated as something the United States could argue we wanted to do on our own terms. The president fundamentally does not agree with those Negotiation Terms . One thing interesting about his vision and he is conflating two important things about paris, one of the structure of the International Agreement and wonders will we propose to country. For him they are one and the same and he is certainly not happy with the targets put forth, those targets are negotiable wi
clear whether they would do it now or later in the year but it looks quite likely that they will do this as well before the end of the year because japan, like the us nikissing inflation rises well in the bank of japan is in hyping that all we re still waiting for the first tweet policy to tapped the brakes on the economy. it is difficult to brakes on the economy. it is difficult to criticise brakes on the economy. it is difficult to criticise them because they have a really trickyjob because they have a really tricky job to because they have a really trickyjob to do been tackling inflation, while not pushing their economies and to make into recession, but in a good job question will we have to give credit where it is doing it looks as if most central bankers it looks as if most central banke ., it looks as if most central banke- it looks as if most central banke . ., ., bankers have when doing what was a stunning bankers have when doing what was a stunning surgeon - was a stunni
young men and our police as we saw recently in indiana. tucker: so it s easy to dismiss him as a buffoon because he has but if you are a new york city cop, you can t dismiss him. the nypd works for a bill de blasio. imagine hearing your own boss denounce you as a bigot on the basis of the zero evidence. no evidence whatsoever. what effects would that have? would it make you want to risk you like to do your job question mike would it convince you just to give up? you know the answer. you just saw the video. when cops give up like that, criminals thrive and that means that innocent people get hurt. something similar is happening in cities across the country viewed almost every democrat in the presidential race suddenly sounds just like bill de blasio. i have can challenge our can police department to challenge all the ways in which the uniform has been burdened by racism. we re going to crack down on police brutality and primarily people of color. training for police officers
a job question and that needs to be taken into account as well so there needs to be a smooth transition rather than a quantum we re talking about change some say the coal industry top of the last prime minister how how do you work around such a powerful force if you won t be if you were representing so the renewable energy companies. look i mean for the business council we are quite adamant that we are nonpolitical and we don t take a political stand and we cater for all industries so i guess it s not for us to work around. those interests and all for us to present a business perspective and to make sure that all aspects of the debate. i think to work around that is more a an issue for the actual politicians and that s their job but what about this free trade deal that is trade your is negotiating with europe will that change
jobs. and immigration, gun control, all of these things may fall by the wayside. so it is a relief to get the government back opened temporarily. but it is very sobering to think that we still are going to have these challenges. those same 40 obstructionists will be right there. yeah, congressman castro, do you view the priority for the democratic party, the white house, the senate majority leadership, which will be the most involved in there, but also the house as we enter a formal budget negotiation, do you view lifting the sequester as a democratic party priority? well, absolutely, that is something we ll argue for, as gwen mentioned, democrats have not been happy with the fact we re right now at the sequester level funding. so that will be something we ll push for. and congressman moore mentioned something remarkably absent in the political question, which is a type of job question or attention to the fact that we tend to struggle through recovery that has