sanctioning iran, syria, and then setting the table for all these things. the media, if you listen to them, it s like he hasn t done anything in 100 days. so my people aren t listening to that. they are judging based on what they see. they see constant action, a constant move towards progress. keeping those campaign promises and doing the right thing. he has been incredibly responsive as commander-in-chief. his response has been swift and resolute and that as a leader. what i would also point out, if you think about it in three big categories, prosperity he has done so many things, sean. he is about to do some more of - his tax reform. it helps the job creators, the jobseekers and also the job holders. the vast majority of american households are job holders. they are saying, when did the
mother of all bombs. sanctioning iran, syria, and then setting the table for all these things. the media, if you listen to them, it s like he hasn t done anything in 100 days. so my people aren t listening to that. they are judging based on what they see. they see constant action, a constant move towards progress. keeping those campaign promises and doing the right thing. he has been incredibly responsive as commander-in-chief to but his response has been swift and resolute and that as a leader. what i would also point out, if you think about it in three big categories, prosperity he has done so many things, sean. he is about to do some more of his tax reform. it helps the job creators, the jobseekers and also the job holders.
jobs like this. are there experiences from presidential history where the person in those kinds of jobs, where the capabilities of those job holders ended up being really crucial for national security? a perfect example would be 1962, you know, we re all talking about fidel castro tonight. you know, in the cuban missile crisis, john kennedy had to decide, how do i get these soviet missiles out of cuba and he appointed a committee and all sorts of advisers and for a week they argued. robert kennedy was there, john kennedy stood aside because he didn t want to intimidate them. during that week, this committee talked and talked and talked and then moved from what they would have done on the first day, which was to bomb cuba and invade it, get rid of the missiles, to what they decided ultimately to do with kennedy s agreement which was to blockade the island and tell the soviets to get the missiles out, which worked. we now know if you had not had
partisan. although or registered democrat for most of his time as an adult life. very strong views. yes and now we ve got a fox news analyst who has got an interesting past of her own, brought on as the deputy national security adviser and it just feels like these aren t the kind of people who usually fill jobs like this. are there experiences from presidential history where the person in those kinds of jobs, where the capabilities of those job holders ended up being really crucial for national security? a perfect example would be 1962, you know, we re all talking about fidel castro tonight. you know, in the cuban missile crisis, john kennedy had to decide, how do i get these soviet missiles out of cuba and he appointed a committee and all sorts of advisers and for a week they argued. robert kennedy was there, john kennedy stood aside because he didn t want to intimidate them.
here s something else i would tell a republican candidate and do routinely. when you talk to job creators, republicans love to talk to entrepreneurs and job creators. you didn t build this. terrific. check, check. but that s about 7% of our country. then you talk to job seekers. another 7.5% of our country. and the vast majority of women run households in this country are neither job seekers or job creators. they re job holders. who is really speaking to them in the republican party? the other thing we told ken, run as the education governor. i have never in 600 focus groups, i have never sat in a focus group with women and not heard an earful about education. i want to check on a fact here. you said that terry mcauliffe supports gender selection amongst unborn children? he was asked and never disowned or admitted that they will oppose all restrictions and regulations