we need to go back to item one. i would like to rescind item one. with that, we need to divide the file. the amendments to the first/aisle first divided file we will refer that without recommendation as amended as a committee report. and then the second item, we will amend them. there were amendments to the second/aisle. we will pass as amended and continue that to the call of the chair. there were amendments to the second divided file. we will pass as amended and continue that to the call of the chair. item 3, ordinance amending the public works code and administrative code to create new requirements for personal wireless service facility site permits and associated fees. chairperson maxwell: we heard this last week. this will go as a committee report. we have staff from supervisor avalos s office. francis shea here on behalf of supervisor avalos. he apologizes for not being here to address you today. we are asking for your recommendation on the supervisor s ordina
retroactivity. i noticed that you have a good understanding of some of the prior legislation. i would encourage some of that kind of scrutiny in this legislation as well. the second item i would like to skip forward to my matrix, which provided for you. the new york model that supervisor avalos provided last time. it was an rfp to encourage the placement of facilities on light standards. the industry would love to see that in san francisco. it is not a punitive measure as this one is today, but one that encourages cooperation. since the beginning, we have suggested that there be a modification of the wts guidelines, which were discussed earlier, as a way of guiding wireless companies to work with the communities. there is no community outreach at the beginning of the installation of these wireless guidelines under supervisor avalos proposal. there is no aesthetic guidelines here. they are only inches 10 or 12 inches. we strongly encourage you to take a step back, look at