that we should give these borrowers the same type of personalized, sitting around the kitchen table guidance that they initially got when they first buy a home or apply for a mortgage. it helps them and starts them on the road to successful and sustainable home ownership. we also estimate that freddie mac helps more than 250,000 borrowers avoid foreclosure in 2009 both to our traditional methods and this mha program. . let me be clear. our role is to answer questions, provide information, and be responsive. others will decide. others are the decision makers. still, given the opportunity, what kinds of facts we bring to the attention or will we bring to the attention of the decision makers? what are some of the key traits that we believe the u.s. secondary mortgage market ought to include? and do the gse s help the fought housing finance markets achieve these desirable traits? when asked, we will remind decision makers at freddie mac as a constructive, vital rule in the ma
banks something commented on regularly in the financial press? people either panic or they don t. we have seen through history that confidence can be lost in banks. . . clearly, disclosure of this information will deter future borrowers. what is the cutoff? what i think the court should do katyusha make up that date who should make up that day? the alternative would be to reverse the ruling and they could file another request and ask for the separation back in 2008 and the fed would have to be done away whether the information was stale or not stale and then they could get the information that was not stale and then make the judgment as to whether the information was still for a particular bank are you saying that still cannot be about awaited on the present application are you saying that still cannot be awaited dutch evaluated on the present application be evaluated on the present application? you can obviously remanded back to the district court