The independent panel investigating inappropriate editing of online RNZ stories has found one digital journalist was responsible, but problems with newsroom structure, editorial systems and culture also contributed.
The independent panel investigating inappropriate editing of online RNZ stories has found one digital journalist was responsible, but problems with newsroom structure, editorial systems and culture also contributed.
A independent report has found no evidence of an orchestrated pro-Russia campaign behind the inappropriate editing of international new stories by an RNZ web journalist. But it concludes the reporter breached editorial standards and RNZ's international news contract and the organisation created the conditions that allowed that to happen. The report by media lawyer, William Akel and lawyer and former broadcaster Linda Clark found no evidence malicious intent on the part of the journalist, but his actions damaged RNZ's reputation. It makes 22 recommendations. They include: Changing RNZ's editorial structure so its digital news team is integrated into its broader news division, without unecessary delay, to ensure consistant editorial control. Creating a senior role to oversee editorial performance and encourage a culture of editorial integrity. Increased editorial training. And it also suggests there be a formal review of the staffing levels, budget and work load of its digita
A board member at RNZ appointed less than a month ago quit this week after making public comments on Kiri Allan’s downfall and criticising media coverage of it. RNZ had asked Jason Ake to stop and the government said he breached official obligations of neutrality, but he was unrepentant.