i imagine there are more jigsaw pieces, more shoes to drop, whatever analogy you prefer, to come. it is interesting, this is another win for the steele dossier. here s what it says about cohen. cohen played a key role in the trump russia relationship maintaining a koefr maintaining a covert relationship, and his role had grown after manafort left the campaign. another piece from the dossier, cohen is heavily engaged in cover up and damage limitation operation to prevent the full details of trump s relationship with russia being exposed. just because you keep proving one piece of the dossier true doesn t make it all true. once again, another piece of the dossier starts to come into focus. right. and every time that happens, people say we should have not discounted it so quickly. i think it is important what we re talking about here is mueller though is looking for
in the government. the president pushed him out. would dwrou that to a u.s. general or fbi agent? i don t like it. it smells bad. you have been doing a lot of reporting on this as well. what are you hearing? we are sort of trying to put the jigsaw pieces together. the new york times is reporting that there was some hints about the inspector general report containing something that the fbi director, chris wray didn t like and told mccabe and the whole thing sort of came to an end. if you take a step back and look at all of this, you will know that the president of the united states has been tweeting about andrew mccabe since last summer. jeff sessions, the attorney general went to chris wray, the fbi director and said, you know, you have to get rid of this guy. chris wray didn t like that. he went to the white house counsel, reportedly, don mcgahn
mandate, either rosenstein could tell him he could prosecute it or it could be handed off to any of the number a federal law enforcement agencies. it could be handed off to a different u.s. attorney s office. that doesn t matter. my point is that s a distinction without a difference. i m sorry. the problem here, there is jigsaw pieces and they re not yet assembling into a puzzle. you cannot assume that the things that we have seen suggest that there s a relentless forward march direction into something i didn t say that. i m going to put a pin in it for here. john, i think a lot of people would disagree with you that the pieces of the puzzle are not coming together. before we go, because the president is traveling to asia, and this is something i wanted to talk about, if you ve ever traveled to asia, you know how physically demanding that can be. imagine traveling to five countries in less than two weeks, while holding meetings that could help decide the fate of millions
we have 6 million job openings, job openings are at a high level, the highest we have seen in years. and imagine if we could match the 6.9 million to this, the job market would virtually disappear. this is not a jigsaw puzzle but the real world. imagine if i have 20 pounds lighter and had a full head of hair. we can imagine these things. the jigsaw pieces with them piling up, somehow it will work. with the 6 million job openings, about 4 million are what we call churn. there are 3 to 4 million jobs not filled with thing that is don t have to do with the unemployment market. we have 2 million real openings and then the mismatch is, are people trained for it and if not, who is responsible for training them? the government? schools and colleges and
the defense says. but they may try and put this composite picture together. that may take some real time as they try and fit all these tiny jigsaw pieces together to arrive at what they think happened here. and how do they do this? are they going through these pages and pages of instructions that we heard judge nelson reading out? do they kind of go through that as a checklist, generally? well, they typically do it a couple different ways. one is they can sometimes spend even days saying, let s divide up the evidence and go, let s take a look at the forensic evidence. let s take a look at the 911 calls. let s take a look at the eyewitness evidence. they parse those out and go through those and they debate each of those particular pieces of evidence separately. they can sit there and say let s go through the jury instructions and make sure we know legally what we re supposed to be doing and how to follow those guidelines. sometimes, again, this is