Properly. It was done by one engineer. They have a new engineer for the 11 inches. My plan is to follow up with the engineer. Theyre issued a permit we can still look into the concerns of the neighbor and use that permit to look at some of the issues regarding the retaining walls. And i probably would be confirmed the geotechnical report, or at least the report from the Structural Engineer as to why they needed to add the height of the wall. But the wall, its its not that six feet high, its pretty typical of what we see in that neighborhood. So it is something that they misjudged it, they needed another permit. Give an opportunity for another opinion and here we are. Vice president honda one last question. So is it your recommendation that we condition it to have a report or a geo tech report . I think we need the translator to president lazarus yes. Interpreter [speaking foreign language]. Okay. Thank you. You know, like i say, there is another issued permit. And my intention was, i n
Its similar to 44bonview and this is needing upgrading immediately to the public attention. So pretty much the outcome is that if the rear view would be removed, hell have to be more of a financial burden and his family will be in shock pause theyll lose another bedroom. So, please thank you. Youll have more time in rebuttal. So well now hear from the Planning Department. Mr. Sanchez . Thank you. Subject property at 44bofview, located within the r. H. 1 Zoning District and the special use district. I believe that the district was added to the planning code in 1991. Under this district it requires a 35 rear yard and approximately 24. 5 feet for the subject property. And so the main issues here relate to the extension of the rear and the ground level retaining wall and grading issues as well as the deck on top of that structure which for lack of a better term could be described as supported on fourbyfour posts. The Planning Department does not have evidence that the defendant confirmed t