preservation severally. it is a tool that can be used for or against whatever the objective is. i do not see historic preservation as the panacea to affordable housing the way that some have proposed it. at the same time, i do not see affordable historic preservation was the enemy of affordable housing in low-income communities. like any tool, it can be used in different ways. my feeling is though that the best way to treat something as complex as historic preservation is to simply have a balanced approach. toomey, a balanced approach means that you do not require additional step, and additional boat, or survey in one area but not require it in another. that is why this amendment is being presented. it is in that spirit. i appreciate the perspective that has been outlined by supervisor cohen and supervisor wiener. i think they have very good points. i just have a different perspective. thank you. supervisor olague: i wanted to mention i do not see this as a panacea to afforda
preservation as the panacea to affordable housing the way that some have proposed it. at the same time, i do not see affordable historic preservation was the enemy of affordable housing in low-income communities. like any tool, it can be used in different ways. my feeling is though that the best way to treat something as complex as historic preservation is to simply have a balanced approach. toomey, a balanced approach means that you do not require additional step, and additional boat, or survey in one area but not require it in another. that is why this amendment is being presented. it is in that spirit. i appreciate the perspective that has been outlined by supervisor cohen and supervisor wiener. i think they have very good points. i just have a different perspective. thank you. supervisor olague: i wanted to mention i do not see this as a panacea to affordable housing. is time to create an industry and we cannot ignore historically it has had certain impacts on certain com
communities. like any tool, it can be used in different ways. my feeling is though that the best way to treat something as complex as historic preservation is to simply have a balanced approach. toomey, a balanced approach means that you do not require additional step, and additional boat, or survey in one area but not require it in another. that is why this amendment is being presented. it is in that spirit. i appreciate the perspective that has been outlined by supervisor cohen and supervisor wiener. i think they have very good points. i just have a different perspective. thank you. supervisor olague: i wanted to mention i do not see this as a panacea to affordable housing. is time to create an industry and we cannot ignore historically it has had certain impacts on certain committees that have not been positive. i hope in the future we use it as a tool to preserve all the things we value, like affordable housing and other things. i do not think there is anything we have dr
for thinking tools to protect interests of homeowners or tenants to end up in a historic district against their wishes and like them means to pay expenses. there are some protections around giving information to people who reside in those districts currently and there should be a continued push in the planning department to make sure they do appropriate our rights not just when it comes to the issue of historic preservation, but to many issues that deal with development. i feel torn on this one but what did members of the public to know where this was coming from. it was coming from a really good place. from people who saw firsthand some of the negative impact or challenges that some communities faced as a result of some historic preservation policies. i do hear what supervisor campos is saying in regards to wanting to be consistent in how we apply planning processes in the city. supervisor campos: thank you for reading an excerpt from the letter. supervisor chu: it makes