by that do that to mean a diversity of truth? there s no such thing as a diversity of truth. i was wondering why they kept doing the stupid story. cnn, the russia strike, it s like a kid staring at a pot of water on the stove having no idea that the burner is off. it s not getting any hotter. but now i know t why. they had to keep matching the narrative. they created a story to match the narrative for the purposes of ratings. they were treating the story like professional wrestling. they had villains and heroes and they were following a pathng towards a climax, except that the climax never comes. that s why they keep rolling the stuff out. keep going on and on. we fixate on stories at fox, but it s not for ratings. it s because we give a damn. we talked about benghazi every single day. it wasn t for ratings, that s for sure, but it was because we cared. this is why your persona, on this table, and your belief ins
what he thought was more important was climate change.rt so there is also they re having an internal fight over what was more important. there are many people in the newsroom who thought it was more important, and the head guys were like, actually, it s notar writing it all, let s go back to the thing that was rating. i sent you a note about this, anthony was so classy and gracious when cnn apologized, and he was like that s good, we can move on. then the reporters get fired. i m interested to find out their side of the story. one of them, a very formidable adversary when it comes to covering the government, he was the one that broke the news about ksm being held and george w. bush had to come out with that and he ran that even though they asked him not to. they are trying to cover stories too quickly, and they made a preconceived notion. and there s no need to. there s plenty of time. plenty of viewers. m to go with a one source story when you have four reporters, that s way out-of-
apparently not enough money to satisfy him. last time i was here, it was clinton and today it s obama. it s the story. newt gingrich flip-flopped, i respect his work, but he flip-flops more than anybody else i know. he s for it, then he is against it, then he is for before 12:00n let me put this to you, richard. the left made a big thing about this memo that president bush got in the summer or spring whee he was president, his first year, that bin laden determined to attack the u.s. then 9/11 happened. he got killed for that memo. now it looks like president obama, for about six months was receiving very, very detailed f memos and intelligence about actual russian interference and meddling attempts in the u.s. election.rf he did nothing about it. what s the difference?
anybody knew he was going to be president marco rubio said no, no, no. obviously they will not be able to s the solace in this discussion. more chaos at cnn over the network s coverage of the russian investigation. we ve got that story up next. n . we ve got that story up next. can we at least analyze customer traffic? can we push the offer online? legacy technology can handcuff any company. but yes is here. you re saying the new app will go live monday? yeah. with help from hpe, we can finally work the way we want to. with the right mix of hybrid it, everything computes. yeah, cause i got allstate. if you total your new bike, they replace it with a brand new one. that s cool. i got a new helmet. we know steve. switching to allstate is worth it. pressure. i feel it every day. but at night, it s the last thing on my mind.
what we know from thehe reporting and the timeline and the chronology is important here in terms of the background. now we know for certain, talking about on the show last night, and as the story has developed, that president obama believed and knew that russia was trying to influence the united statesht presidential election. and may of 2016, they were already actively involved in unmasking officials and trying to find proof of collusion, warrants within the trump o campaign at the time, trying to find if anybody was colluding with the russians. so if he knew all that and he t didn t say anything when candidate trump got the nomination and he didn t say anything between the period of time when candidate trump got the nomination and then eventually won the presidency, why is that? not only did he not say anything, apparently he didn t do much of anything either. is that dereliction of duty when you know that the russians are trying to create this espionage