Independent production fund, with support from the partridge foundation, a john and polly guth charitable fund. The clements foundation. Park foundation, dedicated to heightening Public Awareness of critical issues. The herb alpert foundation, supporting organizations Whose Mission is to promote compassion and creativity in our society. The bernard and audre rapoport foundation. The john d. And catherine t. Macarthur foundation, committed to building a more just, verdant, and peaceful world. More information at macfound. Org. Anne gumowitz. The betsy and jesse fink foundation. The hkh foundation. Barbara g. Fleischman. And by our sole corporate sponsor, mutual of america, designing customized individual and Group Retirement products. Thats why were your retirement company. Welcome. It will take a long time to recover from whats been happening in washington. But we now know the insurrection against the rule of law didnt happen spontaneously. It was hatched months ago. Not by rankandfile
Superintendent me young lee to Work Together to come inwith a plan that would both allow this program to move forward, because it is clearly a priority for the district and for the city, and, n the same time, be fiscally responsible. And so our preference is to move forward with the supplemental that would use rainy day and peef baseline funds. And not use any of the state supplemental reserve. None of the options were talking about includes the rainy day. So would the mayor support or not support any of the three options that we are talking about right now, through the supervisor, Jason Elliott Mayors Office, through the chair to supervisor campos. This has been an issue thats been debated and talked about for several weeks now. As the proposal involves fund sources of both and the conversation that budget director howard and deputy superintendent me young lee has been centered around using the rainy day reserve funds which are available, and on using a peef balance which has grown a
President chiu supervisor wiener has asked to duplicate the file. One of the amendments would include the rainy day reserve in the place of the state revenue loss reserve and the other would be as supervisor kim has suggested. Is that correct . Supervisor wiener no. The the motion would be to duplicate the file and then to eliminate the state reserve money from one version of the file, and to remove the peef money from the other version of the file and nothing with respect to the Rainy Day Fund. Just voting then on two separate sources. Does that make sense . President chiu supervisor wiener has can i ask a point of clarification. I thought supervisor wiener was suggesting that we divide the question . President chiu i think thats initially what he stated but now youre withdrawing that suggestion. Supervisor wiener im asking to duplicate the file and send separately to the mayor. It seems the peever money is not controversial and i would want to give money to the School District as qui
Many Party Committees as you want and as many pacs as you want. All of those things are capped right now, which would mean just in real terms that instead of about 123,000 being the cap, one donor could give 3. 5 million to Political Parties and candidates. There was this moment during the oral arguments when Justice Scalia told solicitor general verrilli that compared with the billions of dollars already spent on federal campaigns by parties, candidates, Political Action committees and super pacs, he said, i dont think 3. 5 million is a heck of a lot of money. Does this surprise you to hear that from a Supreme Court justice . Well, i will say two things. One is 3. 5 million is a lot of money, i think, to just about anyone except for the, you know, the adelsons of the world. But the other thing that i will just say, and this was made by another commentator, talk about chutzpah. So the reason that these people are spending millions and millions and millions of dollars in the last electi
Want. All of those things are capped right now, which would mean just in real terms that instead of about 123,000 being the cap, one donor could give 3. 5 million to Political Parties and candidates. There was this moment during the oral arguments when Justice Scalia told solicitor general verrilli that compared with the billions of dollars already spent on federal campaigns by parties, candidates, Political Action committees and super pacs, he said, i dont think 3. 5 million is a heck of a lot of money. Does this surprise you to hear that from a Supreme Court justice . Well, i will say two things. One is 3. 5 million is a lot of money, i think, to just about anyone except for the, you know, the adelsons of the world. But the other thing that i will just say, and this was made by another commentator, talk about chutzpah. So the reason that these people are spending millions and millions and millions of dollars in the last election is Justice Scalia. You know, theyre the ones who allowe