Understand why all the legislation that is introduced it is not to protect the landlords but it is only to protect the tenants my tenants they always unlock my doors and it is just easy to let my children go out and easily to be hit by the cars as well and for this case i just feel strongly against this legislation and im hope you guys can understand. speaking foreign language. and also feel i really have been issues towards my tenants even if i pay a lot of the money to keep them up but still helpless. Thank you, ms. Low speeding i also here to against this proposal because that proposal for me is very unreasonable and unfair i strongly against it. Thank you. We do have a couple of more speaker cards and ill call the next 10. Hello, im Terrance Jones he sell building in the city and supervisor kim id like to environment you on your dpiflt i would have exposed for diversity in listening to both sides this is a onesided agreement my real estate likes this part with the increase difficul
Find after School Teachers anywhere so rent issues impact families and schools and basically, if we dont have strong renter right were getting the middleincome and i and many of the all over the have that had to move out of the city on 1049 Market Street 80 units of Affordable Housing the landlord is moving in people and renter that are trying to save our homes thank you for your support and please continue to support us and support Affordable Housing for our city thank you. Thanks ms. Cooper. Hi, im john im here today to summarize a letter from the several excuse me. From several members the San Francisco Bay Area Renters Federation we dont have a policy many of us did sign the letter we would like to is that just cause makes several changes to the renters law it reducing reduces to stop the sharp practices the longtime solution to build more housing but we feel just cause 2. 0 doesnt interfere but has a displacement strategy for the housing to an affordable level with more protection
Touch the baseboard again without our agreement and i our real issue is very unfair and unreasonable i hope you guys understand. Thank you thank you thank you, thank you ms. Chung. Good morning today is my name is chain limb a tuesday, september 22, 2015. This is the regular meeting of the abatement appeals board the small Property Owner im i go a license. First item on the agenda is roll call. Commissioner clinch commissioner mar commissioner mccray commissioner walker and commissioner mar commissioner president melgar is excused next item to the oath all parties giving testimony please stand and raise your right hand do you solemnly swear or affirm the testimony youre about to give will be the whole truth and nothing but the truth . To the best of your acknowledge okay. Thank you you may be seated the next item speaking foreign language. thank you. As a house to rents im a small Property Owner of San Francisco opposed to owners but did not plan to rent out due to the top rent control
Know that the baseboard it owned by the landlord not owned by the tenants but our tenant is occupied that space and locked up our baseboard and none can touch the baseboard again without our agreement and i our real issue is very unfair and unreasonable i hope you guys understand. Thank you thank you thank you, thank you ms. Chung. My name is chain limb a small Property Owner im i go a license. speaking foreign language. thank you. As a house to rents im a small Property Owner of San Francisco opposed to owners but did not plan to rent out due to the top rent control and the potential risk im getting into during the last hearing there was a woman if an organization kept mentioning in the landlord doing anything wrong they dont have to be afraid of the reversal this is a joke for all all right in the Current Situation regardless of the whether the unit is legal or legally they have to pay a huge fee when we want our unit back we dont have a huge income were average people and we struggl
Recommended approval to the Planning Commission, recognizing it was an illegal unit, it wasnt subject to the regular directive, in that case, the Planning Commission did not align themselves with staffs recommendation and voted to deny the permit and i dont want to talk too much about this case, its not on the calendar but will be back before you and i want to avoid the same scenario apologies for the lateness of this information but if during the rebuttal, the appellant can indicate whether they would have any indication of taking the discretionary review, i think that would help us inform the board. Theres no long gap in time like the last one . That is correct. And a lot of process in between. Yes, and just for the boards kind of informationfinger we do have another case thats similar with a bbn that was not properly noticed and its our intention to avoid that additional process of the Planning Commission hearings when their outcome cannot be fully guaranteed, were looking at other