Latest Breaking News On - Jerome pichay - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Court of Appeals (File photo) MANILA - The Court of Appeals (CA) has dismissed a suit filed by a technology firm which questioned a ruling by the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) on an illegal dismissal case of two engineers hired under fixed-term contracts. In a 20-page decision promulgated May 25, the appellate court dismissed the petition filed by electronic manufacturer Huawei Technologies Phils. Inc. Huawei took the case to the CA to question the Dec. 29, 2020 decision of the NLRC, which reversed the ruling of the labor arbiter and ruled that electronics and communications engineers, Jerome Pichay and Ricardo Aquino Sampang Jr., were regular employees who were illegally dismissed. Pichay was hired in 2014 for a project and eventually rehired for a fixed term ending Jan. 15, 2019. Sampang, on the other hand was first hired in 2010 with subsequent contracts for fixed term employment, the last of which was terminated on July 18, 2018. The NLRC ruled that for almost a decade

Jerome pichayRicardo aquino sampang jrNational labor relations commissionHuawei technologiesCourt of appeals file photo manila the ca has dismisseda suit filed bya technology firm which questioneda ruling by national labor relations commission nlrc on an illegal dismissal case two engineers hired under fixed term contracts ina 20 page decision promulgated may 25He appellate court dismissed the petition filed by electronic manufacturer huawei technologies phils inc took case to ca question dec 29020 decision of the nlrcHich reversed the ruling of labor arbiter and ruled that electronics communications engineersErome pichay and ricardo aquino sampang jrEre regular employees who were illegally dismissed pichay was hired in 2014 fora project and eventually rehired fixed term ending jan 15019 sampangN the other hand was first hired in 2010 with subsequent contracts for fixed term employmentHe last of which was terminated on july 18018 the nlrc ruled that for almosta decade under successive fixed term contractsHe two performed tasks necessary for huawei 39s businesses and that the contracts were designed to prevent them from acquiring regular employment status company was ordered pay php4 75 million representing separation in lieu of reinstatement full back wages quot there is no genuine freedom contract whena fixed term used asa vehicle exploit economic disadvantage workers like pichay sampangUot the ca said