But we are counting down to our next system moves in, that will be on sunday. So, tomorrow, just a few clouds. Sunday, more clouds. Those clouds making a comeback as well. Here is the current satellite showing you this, the high call could cover moving its way and. It is this quad band that will be developing the cold front and that will sweep into the bare area bay area about 52 hours from this afternoon, so we are talking sunday afternoon into sunday nine. Go out and enjoy later today. We are looking great. Saturday, just adding some high clouds to the mix by three oclock and then you can see a big change by sunday. Especially by sunday afternoon. We have some more Rain Coverage here back in the bay area. Coming up, we will talk more about this and also your new year forecast coming up in a few minutes. Thank you. New at noon, a box truck overturned this morning on 680 in Pleasant Hill. But the truck didnt end up on its side. It somehow ended up on its nose. It happened on northbound
Additional funding is provided by. Drporate funding is provi by. Welcome to firing line, chairman adam schiff. Thank you. You are the chairman of the house inlligence committee, the democratically controlled committee th ran the impeachment hearing for President Trump. At what point in the process did you, mr. Chairman, begin to be convinced that the president had committec imble offenses . I dont know that i c or testimony becau plot really unfolded during the course of the investigation. Unusual, having beenigation so a prosecutor many years ago, th is very much analogous to a whitecollar complex criminal case. Those cases are almost always very documentdriv, but here the administration completely stonewalled our investigation. We they said,e not gog to give you any documents. Were not gonna make any witnesses available, but because of the courage of a number of Public Servants who defied the white house and came forward and testified, we learned about this effort to shake down the p
Additional funding is provided by. Corporate funding is provided by. Welcome to firing line, thank you. Schiff. You are the chairman of the house intelligence committee, thdemocratically controlled committee that ran the impeachment hearing for President Trump. At what point in the process did you, mr. Chairman, begin toe convinced that the president had committed impeachable offenses . I dont know that i can pinpoint a specific day t timony because the plot really unfolded during the course of the investig what made the investigation so unusual, having beenan a prosecutoryears ago, this is very much analogouste to a wollar complex criminal case. Those cases are almost always rery documentdriven, but the administration completely they said, were nottigation. Going to give you any documents. Were not gonna make any witnesses available, but because of the courage of a number of Public Servants who defied the white h and came forward and testified, we learned about this effortto hake down
Assess over the last 76 days is this whether President Trump abused the power of his office through a quid pro quo robbery extortion or whatever by withholding a meeting or Security Assistance as a way of pressuring ukrainian president selenski to investigate the president s political rival former v. P. Biden for the president s political benefit in the upcoming election a secondary allegation that has been levied is whether President Trump obstructed congress during the inquiry. Evidence of taim during the inquiry does not support either of those allegations the republican report of evidence lays out the reasons in more detail but i will summarize i will begin with the substantive allegation about an abuse of power. The inquiry has returned no direct evidence of President Trump without a meeting or Security Assistance in order to pressure president alinsky to investigate former v. P. Biden witnesses who testified in the in korea have denied having awareness of criminal activity or eve
Them in the right direction. Witnesses in the impeachment inquiry testified that the allegation of ukrainian influence in the 2016 election was appropriate to examine. Ambassador volker testified that he thought it was fine to investigate allegations about 2016 influence. Ambassador taylor said, for example, that the allegations surprised and disappointed him, on this record i do not believe one could conclude that President Trump had no legitimate basis to raise a concern about efforts by ukrainians to influence the 2016 election. Let me now turn to the first assertion that President Trump withheld a meeting with president zelensky as a way of pressuring him to investigate the former vp. Here it is important to note ukraines long, profound history of endemic corruption. Several witnesses during the inquiry have testified about these problems. Ambassador marie yovanovitch, for example, said ukraines corruption is not just prevalent but, frankly, is the system. Witnesses testified to ha