Beyond a reasonable doubt is that we have a standard in this country where we will let nine people who are guilty go free so that we do not convict one innocent. Thats what the definition of beyond a reasonable doubt is. And jeffrey, you accept the jury virkts in other cases. Why is this case different . Why are people having such a difficult time with o. J. Simpson when the jury has an opportunity to review the evidence, you had skilled prosecutors presenting the case, they made a decision. How come people cant accept that decision where we accept jury decisions in thousands of cases every day in this country. Heres something no, i accept the jurys verdict. I recognize that was the jurys verdict. But i dont have to agree with it. I disagree with jury verdicts all the time. That doesnt mean that the jury verdicts are wrong. Thats just my opinion about them. Certainly it is that was the verdict in the case. I dont certainly i certainly accept it in that sense but do i agree with it . Ab
Collapsed, President Trump hosting these frustrated republicans at the white house and demanding they stay put, stay in town until a new plan is in place. The only problem is that its not spirentirely clear whatsoev what that plan would look like and we are now starting to hear from these senators about what went down in the meeting. But first, let me play something for you. This is the president of the United States just as the lunch was beginning. Roll it. Were close. I think were a lot closer than people understand, and we have to pull it through. So important. But were in this room today to deliver on our promise to the American People to repeal obamacare and to ensure that they have the health care that they need. We have no choice. We have to repeal and replace obamacare. We can repeal it, but the best is repeal and replace, and lets get going. I intend to keep my promise, and i know you will too. Obamacare was a big lie. You can keep your doctor, lie. You can keep your plan, lie
Putin happened after their scheduled meeting at the g20 summit. Were going to tell you why the meeting is raising concerns and what the white house is saying about it. And just a brief conversation at the end of dinner, thats how the white house describes this second meeting between President Trump and Vladimir Putin. But Officials Say the discussion lasted an hour. And the only translator available was russias translator. And there are new developments about donald trump jr. s meeting with a russian lawyer. You hear the white house, theyre downplaying this second meeting, a substantive conversation with Vladimir Putin. The white house is saying it was simply a social gathering, its just something that happens and during the course of a dinner that all World Leaders were having, but the meeting im told by white house officials was just over an hour, but it happened after the two had their official meeting at the end of the g20 summit in germany. After the dinner, at some point, the u.
Of people but that was not what was really the true impetus for what happened here. What was the true impetus was that there were intimate family photos that were taken from him, literally stolen, and there is no dispute that these would not be any type of judgment, collections, these are just intimate family photos. Mr. Simpson had a former family. He had a second family. Theres pictures of him with his mother and other things, famous celebrities, and they were not subject to being taken they probably have no value to most people, but they have all the value in the world to mr. Simpson. Theyre not footballs. And thats what set it up. And mr. Beardsley had these photos or at least represented to me on the phone that he had these photos and i had made every effort that i could to try and obtain those intimate family photos that i was well aware were basically all mr. Simpson wanted in the first place. Unfortunately, whatever happened, mr. Beardsley was never able to get those to me. He
respect the jury in los angeles that acquitted him for the murders. we can t have it both ways. well, there are two juries, though, weren t there, in california. there was the civil jury that found he had committed the murder. we re talking about the criminal case. no, i m talking about the civil case. we had testimony as to his prior conduct with nicole brown-simpson in the civil case so we can consider everything, can t we? shouldn t we? well, the letters brooke, the letters that the commissioners made reference to are letters where people who are actually, areva, forgive me for cutting you off. i want to hear what you re saying but let s pop up the volume and listen to what they re saying in this parole room. talking to no one here. i m talking to no one. i m talking to space. jeffery felix, a complete fraud.