thought about it. and isn t it the thought that counts? the wall street journal has just reported that the doj made that decision for two reasons one, because biden s attorneys were being good old boys and girls and, quote: cooperating and, two, they wanted to avoid complicating the investigation. now, why does biden get to search his own classified records while donald trump gets his house raided by the feds? legal scholar jonathan turley makes the most sense of it saying, quote: the president has a host of people who regularly handle classified material so why use the lawyers? the answer appears the same as in the case of hillary clinton s email control. hillary clinton can erase 33,000 emails and joe biden can move these documents around. it s what the democrats do. they control what gets out to the public. and it s why we re only finding out about this now three months after the first batch of documents were found in joe biden s chinese funded think tank. now, if this h
a whopping 35 days until the all important midterms and vial personal attacks from the left are reaching a fever pitch. they cannot run on their record with absolutely nothing positive to run on. democrats are now attempting to dehumanize republicans all across the country and set a gubernatorial races. they do so from a glass house. tonight we will expose two democratic candidates for senate who do not deserve the vote in their respective states. we began in the great state of georgia tonight. while the media mob is obsessing over anonymous sources and the new york times regurgitated by other media and fixated on family drama surrounding republican herschel walker. they have been more than happy to ignore very serious allegations against the democrat senator rafael warnock. warnock was ordered by a superior court judge to attend mediation after he was accused of neglecting his own children, failing to pay child care expenses despite amassing a net worth of nearly a million d
did you not know on friday that those documents had been found when you were at the podium or are you being directed by someone to not be forthcoming on this issue? i have been forthcoming from this podium. what i said yes to is what the statement at the time that we all had, right? y all had the statement and i was repeating what the what the what the counsel was sharing at that time. judge jeanine: sources tell cnn that searches are still being conducted by the president s lawyers. so, there could still be another batch of documents just laying out there in the open. is it a coincidence that the big guy spent the weekend back home in delaware? some are asking if joe went home to sift through the documents himself. but karine jean-pierre won t give us an answer on that one. the president loves his delaware home, it s an extremely personal space for him is he physically joining in the search
today. based on what we saw, press secretary karine jean-pierre won t be happy about it. you said a few times that you really can t talk about communications between the biden campaign and twitter. who is telling you that that s off limits? i ve already had that conversation with you, with your colleague i believe yesterday. i have already addressed this multiple times this week. i don t have anything more to add. i am going to harris: i think it was before she walked out at one point. the top republican in the u.s. house leader kevin mccarthy is in focus. we ll begin with fox news correspondent griff jenkins in washington, d.c. griff. there is a lot in those 30 tweets in the second drop is raising questions whether twitter executives lied when they claimed under oath before congress that the didn t engage in shadow banning in the lead-up to the 2020 election which we
steve hilton host of the next revolution. what are your thoughts about where we sit with this? first of all, harris, of course it s great that any american is back. any american regardless of their politics, regardless of their identity, which we ve been hearing a lot about from the left. they are all americans and want them all home. all, including paul whelan. you look at the deal and think why didn t they push for a better deal? it brings us to the next question which is whether or not john kirby, karine jean-pierre, all of those people making their point it was either 1 or 0, that there was no deal that could have involved paul whelan. were they lying? nbc news report yesterday said there was a choice. the white house did make a choice. that report was sourced to the white house. so who is telling the truth