Currys first ever block party. At chase center, we take you inside. From the areas local news station. Youre watching the kron. 4 morning news at 7. Hey, good morning. Thank you so much for joining us here on the kron. 4 morning news. Im Stephanie Lin. Its sunday. May the 19th. Lets get your morning started with a look at the weather with dave sphar. Good morning, dave. Well, good morning, stephanie. Good morning, everybody. Not a bad start. Either relay taking care of a lot of that fog to get things going across the bay. Its starting to break up nicely. Even in San Francisco. We can see. Some sunshine to start. So were off to a better start today than we had from yesterday. That will add a little bit of extra heating for the day, too. And some of the spots that didnt get so much from yesterday. Heres a live shot of the east bay shoreline. We have some leftover fog still kind of working its magic a little bit. There. But as far as the big view of things, High Pressure is about to take
Bad. Now we are seeing again, a blanket of the great sitting a little bit higher up this morning. So we havent seen a lot of visibility issues. As you can see, visibility has been holding just fine for most spots. Winds a little bit calmer than yesterday. Still very present, though, and will remain present out of the west pushing that ocean cool there into the bay specially during evening and Morning Hours when the fog rolls in. Temperatures right now are in the 50s conquered sitting at 57 oakland and alameda at 55 later on today into that, sunshine were already getting more and more of daytime highs will rise into the 70s rain. All right, john, thank you for that. A lot of friday finally hitting friday light. Bridge is looking good. Might be a good time to get some things done right now, 13 minute ride into the city. We had some Traffic Building at the earlier part of the morning. Now, look at that. So sailing 14 minutes on the mateo bridge. Richmond, sandra fell bridge just short of
Nancy caught, for her support of our endeavor here today. Today, we will address a timely topic the participation of historians in courtroom proceedings. Theres no systematic study, but the evidence we have indicates of, for instance, scholarly amicus briefs, where scholars file amicus briefs in court proceedings, has been increasing. Theres a long history of scholarly input into Appellate Court cases stretching back at least to the famous brandeis inef in a Supreme Court case 1908, but for our purposes, our pedigree as historians might be traced back to the brown versus board of education litigation in which the distinguished cptorians helped the in aa casee naacp make the against School Segregation. More recently, 400 historians signed an amicus brief in the case of webster versus reproductive services, the abortion rights case from 1989, tell youanelists will about things that are both older and more recent. In addition, historians testifying at trial has a quite long pedigree. As j
The organization of american historians hosted this 90minute event at their annual meeting in new orleans. Ok. Ok, so, i think we are ready to get started. Sorry for the delay, but welcome to the first Plenary Session of the 2017 annual meeting of the organization of american historians. Our session is called historians in court. It examines the complex roles of historians applying their scholarly skills to courtroom litigation. Thanks, first, to the o. A. H. For organizing this session and, in particular, to the president , nancy cott, for her support of our endeavor here today. Today, we will address a timely topic the participation of historians in courtroom proceedings. Theres no systematic study, but the evidence we have indicates that the use of, for instance, scholarly amicus briefs, where scholars file amicus briefs in court proceedings, has been increasing. Theres a long history of scholarly input into Appellate Court cases stretching back at least to the famous brandeis brief
Okay. So i think were ready to get started. Sorry for the delay. But welcome to the first meeting. Our session is called historians in court, examines the complex role of historians applying their scholarly skills to courtroom litigation. Thanks first to the oah for organizing this session and in particular to the president , nancy cott, for her support of our endeavor here today. Today we will address a timely topic, the participation of historians in courtroom proceedings. There is no systemic study, but the evidence we have indicates that the use of, for instance, scholarly am kus briefs where scholarings filed briefs in Court Proceedings has been increasing. Now, there is a long history of scholarly input into Appellate Court cases stretching back at least to the famous brandis brief in 1908. But for our purposes, our pedigree as historians will be traced back to the brown versus board of education in which the distinguished historians helped the naac thrks make the case against Sc