THE FOUNDATION "Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel." Patrick Henry (1788) IN TODAY'S DIGEST Facebook: Oops. Sorry, Patriot Post Our Mistake! Good Riddance to a Petty, Classless Speaker House GOP Announces Biden Probe Executive News.
On June 30, the US Supreme Court issued a decision in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) limiting the latter’s ability to regulate carbon. 14.07.2022, Sputnik International
Resistance from condo owners has made it tough to bring back mask requirements after getting rid of them. People who enjoyed relative freedom when COVID-19 eased are reluctant to give it up now.
Mon, Nov 2nd 2020 9:35am
Jess Miers
Everyone wants to do something about Section 230. It’s baffling how seldom we talk about what happens next. What if Section 230 is repealed tomorrow? Must Twitter cease fact-checking the President? Must Google display all search results in chronological order? Perhaps PragerU would finally have a tenable claim against YouTube; and Jason Fyk might one day return to showering the Facebook masses with his prized collection of pissing videos.
Suffice to say, that’s not how any of this works.
Contrary to what seems to be popular belief, Section 230 isn’t what’s stopping the government from pulling the plug on Twitter for taking down NY Post tweets or exposing bloviating, lying, elected officials. Indeed, without Section 230, plaintiffs with a big tech axe to grind still have a significant hurdle to overcome: The First Amendment.