China, ill just say this. This summit was not about china. That was not the purpose of the meeting, but china came up. Not to say we dont share concerns about the economic coercion or heightened tensions caused by china, put this summit was about our relationship with each other and deepening cooperation across an entire range of issues that went beyond the immediately issues we raised. It was about a more peaceful and prosperous indopacific, a region quite frankly would benefit everyone living there and Around The World if we get it right. Its not just here. It has impact. Anyway, i wont get going. Itll take too long. Today is just how committed we are to see this vision take place. And i think this relationship we put together, and i think youre going to see it expand. This is a historic meeting, but were about to lay in place a longterm structure for a relationship that will last and have a phenomenal impact not just in asia but Around The World. Someone once said in a different con
victims of recent mass shottings testifying before congress today. we heard from the mother of 21-year-old zaire goodman who was wounded and survived the mass shooting at a buffalo grocery store last month which was motivated by racist hate. she described her son as pure joy and calling the person who shot him a domestic terrorism and says domestic terrorism occurs is because america is inherently violent. my son has a hole in the right side of his neck, two on his back and another on his left leg caused by an exploding bullet from an ar-15. if after hearing from me and the other people testifying today does not move to you act on gun laws i invite you to my home to help clean my son s wounds so that you may see up close the damage that has been caused to my son and to my community. we then heard from dr. roy guerrero, the only pediatrician in uvalde who described the horror that he witnessed two weeks ago in the city s emergency room. two children whose bodies had been
election. what do you make of this connection here? so one of the major defenses for donald trump in these cases is i was relying on my attorney, right? and that s going to be one of his defenses. it s called advice of kuns counsel, and that requires you in good faith rely on your lawyer s advice. and if your lawyer made a mistake and gave you bad advice by accident, then you might not be responsible if you accident lecommitted a crime. what this shows, i think, is this was not a good faith legal advice given to trump. this was an activist lawyer who part of his strategy and there are e-mails that the january 6th select committee also had showing, an e-mail between mr. chesebro and mr. eastman, the two architects of the january 6th strategy. and part of that was to create havoc and destruction and chaos hoping that that would put
that the act binds vice president pence because the attorney concluded that a negative court ruling with would tank the january 6th strategy. he encouraged the legal team to avoid the courts this. email cemented the direction of the january 6th plan. in other words, there was a plan that in theory could be used again it. could be rolled out again in which they are trying to create a legal theory that it is legal to overturn the results of an election. your thoughts? yeah, joy, judge david carter, a federal judge from the middle district of california has been virtually screaming from the rooftops in his legal rules litigating the question of whether john john eastman is required to give over e-mails because of the crime fraud exception, because they were discussing committing crimes to try to overturn the results of a presidential election, committing crimes, too, in a very real sense to bring an end