richard nixon s enemies list. it just might be relevant today as we learn new details about how to the top fbi officials have been publicly targeted by donald trump. they found themselves on the business end of the audits. the end of roe could be followed by a cascade of other personal rights falling away. it looks like that is already beginning to happen. this is how alabama republicans are using the trump stacked supreme court language against vulnerable kids. i will talk to the director of one clinic who is finding a way to fight back against the states new abortion ban. good morning. it is saturday, july 9th. we are days away from the resumption of the january six committee is a story public hearings. we are less than 24 hours removed from when the committee s investigators heard testimony from one of the most sought after in vital witnesses to date. a person who was not only in the room, but was part of the conversation. nbc news has learned from a source familiar with
cipollone has been front and center for other important scenes and testimony. the january six committee wanted to discuss a january 3rd oval office committee. several high officials work together to stop donald trump from installing jeffrey clark. he is an unqualified individual who is a proponent of fake theories. he advocated overturning the election as the active attorney general. jason miller told the special committee that cipollone confronted the lawyer about the undemocratic theory that he peddled to trump. the vice president could stop the electoral count and essentially unilaterally decide the presidential election. do not forget that according to testimony already unearthed by the select committee, when his vice president, mike pence, did not go along with that un-american scheme that donald trump expressed, pence said
and it s never too late to join them. get unlimited data with 5g included for just $30 a line per month when you get 4 lines. thanks for watching the katie switch to xfinity mobile today. phang show. i will be back tomorrow. velshi is next. back tomorrow. velshi is next today on velshi, a hand at what could be the bombshell become. donald trump s top white house lawyer. it was a marathon session with the january six committee. it was described as a cooperative witness. the testimony was well worth it according to a committee member. we will have the very latest on what we know, what it means, and what is ahead. also, history lesson about
reaching the committee. keep in mind that the idea that more witnesses, more time, that means that the committee feels like it is on its side. thank you for your reporting. your justice department reporter for the new york times and msnbc. joining us now is daniel goldman. he served as the majority counsel for the house impeachment inquiry into donald trump. he s the former director of investigations in the house intelligence committee. he is a former assistant u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york. he is also running for congress in new york s ten districts. dana, thank you for joining us. i want to continue where we left off with katie. the committee seems to be thinking that these hearings are having an impact. that means that they may go a little longer with that. talk to me about that. this was not the plan. they add hearings from time to time. there is some talk that they might at hearings. there could be more in july or even in august. yeah. i think that they a
that he deserved to be targeted by the mop. joining me now is a justice department reporter for the new york times. she is also an msnbc contributor. katie, good morning to you. we do not know what happened in that meeting. we. we have heard from one of the committee members that pat cipollone did not contradict prior testimony. i assume they mean cassidy hutchinson s testimony. correct. you are right. we do not know exactly what he said. the committee wants to hold this closely. if he contributed new information, if he had something that was explosive, they would want to roll that out in a televised hearing from maximum impact. one of the questions that he was often asked was to cooperate other peoples testimony. they re trying to understand why he stopped specific actions from happening. why were they illegal? what were those actions doing? what would they have resulted in? from the point of view of the top lawyer of the white house, why was that legally wrong?