acted sooner so neil katyal, it took nancy pelosi six months just t name the members of the januar 6th committee that ended u doing a fantastic job. when you look at - how i look at the justic department from the outside, this kind of pace doesn surprise me at all andrew s points are really important here this is one of those cases where speed matters. yeah, so lawrence, th american system is really base on the idea that no person i above the law, and donald trum has gotten special treatment and he has gotten it for years he got it when he was presiden to the point where bill barr said you could not indict him, and then in the muelle investigation, all sorts o coddling and lying about wha the mueller appoints that from the attorney general of th united states. and now we are learning that special treatment continue even in 2021, and 2022
the votes in new hampshire if he loses new hampshire, like, it s a lot of issue that s going to play on fox news in a way that there is some deterrent effect, harry, fro this settlement. i don t disagree. all the, the settlement amount itself, chris, it s a big check, but i don t think it could v been much less than that whatever deterrent effect it had, it already, i think, di have and you are right that nothing is going to penetrate the fo bubble there would ve been possibility in the way other large cases in american histor have done and maybe the januar 6th committee was aiming for this of establishing a socia fact in the broad middle not for all of a sudden fox to have the scales fall from thei eyes there are things that could ve happened, including a carefull crafted apology that will no now. it will just be a muddle and foxville go on with its weighs more easily than it would ve i it had been a blockbuster we
had, it already, i think, di have and you are right that nothing is going to penetrate the fo bubble there would ve been possibility in the way other large cases in american histor have done and maybe the januar 6th committee was aiming for this of establishing a socia fact in the broad middle not for all of a sudden fox to have the scales fall from thei eyes there are things that could ve happened, including a carefull crafted apology that will no now. it will just be a muddle and foxville go on with its weighs more easily than it would ve i it had been a blockbuster we anticipated. quick follow-up on that i think there will be some shareholder losses this isn t a more nice amoun of money that comes from murdaugh s management. harry, there is a chance, think there is going to be shareholder lawsuits that migh have their own effect once tha ball starts rolling. 100%. that would ve already been the case all i m saying is, the opportunity cost of not having this evidence here for a p
from former vice president mik pence is a real public pushing back of any sort of form o testifying which what he - as vice president when it come to former president trump. when we think about the januar 6th committee, he didn t wan to come before lawmakers and detail that. that means that you just write a book about this. he has written op-eds abou sort of his duty and his actions on january 6th it will be very interesting to see exactly what he can say an what he will say in testifying if he ends up testifying which now of course it seems like he will i will say that some of this reporting that says there is carveouts here that you migh not be able to or might not be able to force to be testifie on his actions and on specific things that happened on januar 6th. so i think those are crucial his team will say that those are crucial. so it s really interesting and really will be to see exactl what he ends up coming to th grand jury with and what information he glanced provide which inf
to former president trump. when we think about the januar 6th committee, didn t want t come before lawmakers to detai that that being said, he did write book about this. he has ridden op-eds about his duty and his actions on januar 6th. it will be very interesting to see exactly what he can say an what he will say when he s testifying, if he ends u testifying, which of course, i now seems like he will i will say this on thi reporting that says those carv out here is, that they might not be able to or might not be forced to testify, rather, o his actions and on specifi things that happened on januar 6th. so, i think those carveouts ar crucial. his team will say thos carveouts are crucial. so, i think it s reall interesting and we ll be ver interesting to see what he exactly ends up coming to th grand jury with, and wha information is clients can provide, and what informatio he is providing. but i think it is surprising because we ve just never bee in the situation where a forme vice pre