judge cannon seems to say that a former president might be different in her view than a regular joe. quoting her now, as plaintiff articulated at the hearing, the investigation and treatment of a former president is of unique interest to the general public, and the country is best served by an orderly process that promotes the interest and perception of fairness. unique interest, she writes, before granting what the former attorney general under president trump, no less, recently said this about. well, i think the whole idea of a special master is a bit of a red herring at this stage since they ve already gone through the documents. i think it s a waste of time. agree or disagree with that notion and whatever you might think of how judge cannon arrived at her decision, we ll talk about what it portends with our legal experts in just a moment. first, cnn s sara murray who has all the latest on the ruling itself. walk us through what the judge issued today. reporter: as y
odessa. for the third time in ten days, the ukrainian authorities are deeply concerned about the disconnect of eight nuclear reactor at the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. which is 20 miles south of the city of 700,000 people, because they say that it has been disconnected, forcing the use of the backup power, the diesel generating system in order to cool the nuclear reactor. now, this is happened three times in the, past and every time it has happened the concerns over a nuclear meltdown increase. now, there are two un inspectors still on the site. they re supposed to be there permanently, or at least for the foreseeable future. so it will be interesting to see who they ll, blame or whether they go public with what s going on there. meanwhile, the ukrainian president zelenskyy has been claiming relatively limited success saying that it least two villages in the south, during the southern offensive here have been captured. and one village in the east. now, these villages
returned would result in reputational harm of a decidedly different order of magnitude. and a major victory for trump, a third party attorney outside of government will soon be tasked with sifting through thousands of documents to identify personal items and materials that could be protected by attorney client or executive privilege. while it does delay things and slow down, which of course is bad for doj in their case, i think, at the end of the day, we are not going to see a lot of documents pulled by the special master. a judge pointing out some of the seized materials include taxes and accounting information. the ruling, allowing u.s. intelligence agencies to continue their national security damage assessment, but halting the justice department criminal review of its mar-a-lago home. i don t think it has a massive impact in the investigation in the long run. if i were the prosecutor working on this case, i d say, let s just trench forward with a special master, to g
downing street just down the road. but prime minister boris johnson will make a final speech before lustrous her era. we will bring all to you as it happens. good to have you with us, the u.s. justice department is considering its next move hours after losing a legal battle with former president donald trump. a federal judge appointed by trump granted his request for a so-called special master to review documents seized from mar-a-lago. a cnn s sara murray explains, the throws a wrench into the justice department s investigation into potentially mishandled materials. a judge today granted tom trump s request for a special master to review the materials the fbi seized from the extraordinary search at mar-a-lago. judge writing because of trump s role as a former president, the stigma associated with the subject seizure is in a lead of its own. a future indictment based on any degree of property that we are trying to do assault in a reputation ilham of a decidedly differen
election. let s reassure people and get to the polls and elections. the sooner we get rid of this conservative government, the better. they re letting people down, taking people for granted. and i think it s all about boris johnson, it s about getting rid of the conservative party. have you concerned about the state of british politics? there have been four prime ministers in six years. people seem to checked out of politics to some extent because they feel detached, and very tthey have so many of their own party. the conservative leaders have gotten the kwcountry into the ms that they re in. that s why people don t want to listen to these people. in the bielections, liberal democrats beat the conservatives. and we found, talking to people that life-long conservatives were saying no more. we re not going to put up with this conservative party anymore. they don t listen to us. they re taking us for granted, and we want a change. so we ve already got quite a lot of e