troubling sign of behavior and he may have abused his role as a teacher in an effort to sexually exploit the girl. their last known location was in decatur, alabama. leland: the federal judge in seattle who block to the president s first travel ban is now saying his order will not apply to the revision. judge james robards segment two executive orders have enough differences between them. he says he will rule later on the revised travel ban, but keep in mind that two other judges have already blocked the revised ban. to follow the bouncing judges ruling, fred, start with you. just to get a sense. as you look at what s going on
others from trump s advisors as evidence that the travel ban is religiously motivated. they also suggested the administration haven t proven that immigrants court tourists from targeted countries were any more of a national security risk than they might be from many other countries. the bottom line is that president trump faces an uphill battle legally speaking to get this travel ban instigated, although he insists he absolutely has the right to follow these travel ban steps and believes ultimately he will be able to do just that. heather: a lot of the legal experts we have talked to says the judge was completely overreaching, he was not supposed to include his opinion of rhetoric during the campaign in his decision. we will see what happens. asked to lawyers for an answer on anything come you will get different answers, or three if you pay enough. heather: good point, thank you. leland: any minute now, you
his syrian mother-in-law to the u.s. government lawyers argue the revised travel ban is more narrow and provides for waivers. oral arguments will be heard wednesday meantime, washington state has been joined by five others, oregon, maryland, new york, massachusetts and california. nationwide injunction slapped on the original travel ban extended to the executive order 2.0. james robards will make the decision. his injunction drew angry tweets from president trump but was upheld by the ninth circuit court of appeals. they target judges who they believe are going to give them a favorable ruling. they tried to bring these cases in circuits where they are most likely to have injunctions upheld. at the heart of the cases are calls made by then canada tromped on a ban on muslims.
his syrian mother-in-law to the u.s. government lawyers argue the revised travel ban is more narrow and provides for waivers. oral arguments will be heard wednesday meantime, washington state has been joined by five others, oregon, maryland, new york, massachusetts and california. nationwide injunction slapped on the original travel ban extended to the executive order 2.0. james robards will make the decision. his injunction drew angry tweets from president trump but was upheld by the ninth circuit court of appeals. they target judges who they believe are going to give them a favorable ruling. they tried to bring these cases in circuits where they are most likely to have injunctions upheld. at the heart of the cases are calls made by then canada tromped on a ban on muslims.
the president cannot unilaterally compare himself free and reinstate policies of this court already enjoined. at the issue will be decided by judge james robards who president trump called a so-called judge after he issued the restraining order. washington state s attorney general had a news conference couple of days ago, saying the executive order was a victory for america, then yesterday he changed his tune. there are still constitutional problems with the provisions of this revise executive order. the president does not get to decide if a new executive order is different enough to be clear from an underlying injunction. the court decides that. the department of justice had no comment. shannon: what about the trump administration? what is a go from here? they believe this executive order will pass. the biggest difference is a green card and visa holders are