university of iowa. there s a tremendous movement. that challenge is turning those new people out on caucus night. and it s turning in a lot of criticism. when you get to the front, people start looking at it. here a new york times blog today, james kircheck accuses him of supporting anti-government conspiracy theories. he writes, it s impossible to know what ron paul truly this is about black or gay people or the other groups so viciously disparaged in his new letters. what do we know? wew with absolute certainty, theorist who regularly imputes the worst possible motives to the very government he wants to lead. my question to you, mr. chairman, does that offend people? for example, if they were to think that ron paul has flirted with the idea of a truther. that maybe the government with its effort to get us into a war with the islamic states had something to do or knew something about 9/11 ahead of time. does that strike people as whacky or credible? i think that s some of the
that he away from us. that really reminds me of the old days, barry goldwater. we felt that appeal in our 20s and late teens. this idea that ideally we don t need government. need government. when you reach 65 or 70 and have health problems and realize you have parents that are getting old, you realize that government s pretty healthy, sometimes, pretty healthy to have it around. somebody here in iowa that personiies new establishment. he s had crowds of thousands at iowa state university, at the university of iowa. there s a tremendous movement. that challenge is turning those new people out on caucus night. and it s turning in a lot of criticism. when you get to the front, people start looking at it. here a new york times blog today, james kircheck accuses him of supporting anti-government conspiracy theories. he writes, it s impossible to know what ron paul truly this is about black or gay people or the other groups so viciously disparaged in his new letters. what do we kno
personifies new establishment. he s had crowds of thousands at iowa state university, at the university of iowa. there s a tremendous movement. that challenge is turning those new people out on caucus night. and it s turning in a lot ofç criticism. when you get to the front, people start looking at it. here a new york times blog today, james kircheck accuses him of supporting anti-government conspiracy theories. he writes, it s impossible to know what ron paul truly this is about black or gay people or the other groups so vicious lly disparaged in his new letters. what do we know? we know with absolute certainty, however, that ron paul is a paranoid conspiracy theory who regularly imputes the worst possible motives to the very government he wants to lead. my question to you, mr. chairman, does that offend people? for example, if they were to think that ron paul has flirted with the idea of a truther. that maybe the government with its effort to get us into a war with the islamic
this is one of a number of embarrassing videos from 2011. we ll show you. and a pretty big setback to tell but now for newt gingerich and rick perry. two presidential candidates have not collected enough valid signature to appear on the state s primary ballot. athena, everybody is wondering, how in the world if you re a serious candidate for the nomination, can you, i don t know, just forget to get your name on the ballot? they didn t forget, but still, how can this happen? i mean, it s really baffling to a lot of observers here. people were surprised, especially about newt gingerich. but we have gotten a statement from each of these campaigns. the perry campaign says in part, they re going to closely review the facts and law to determine whether an appeal and challenge is warranted. now, gingerich s campaign called the whole way virginia handles its ballot requirement process, they said it s a failed system and they said they re going to pursue an aggressive write-in campa