the leaders of nothing on that day? why didn t all the leaders of the nothing on that day? why didn t all the leaders of the political - nothing on that day? why didn t all the leaders of the political parties l the leaders of the political parties come to that agreement? ? but he s the prime minister. come to that agreement? ? but he s the prime minister. when come to that agreement? ? but he s the prime minister. when you re - the prime minister. when you re havin: an the prime minister. when you re having an election the prime minister. when you re having an election all the prime minister. when you re having an election all the - the prime minister. when you re having an election all the parties are involved in it, when there is a halt for anything like has happened in the past, it is all the parties together agreeing to not do anything on that day. not taking political opportunities. i’m on that day. not taking political opportunities- on that day. not taking politic
the economy does are being slowed down as a result of this gamesmanship and brinksmanship in washington. i just came from nancy pelosi s press conference and it doesn t seem there s any progress to report at all in washington. you re asking the right question is when do markets absolutely lose their minds. as of right now it seems they kind of feel this is typical washington boilerplate and we re going to get a deal. they are very confident a deal is coming here. if they are disappointed to the downside, it could be really ugly, alex. i want to bring james in. we were talking in the break about various forms of brinksmanship here. you were alluding to the brinksmanship between market and congress. there s this whole other game of chicken going on between washington and wall street. it s as though capitol hill wants to be rescued, wants the excuse to move by the markets
attack. so instead, we changed that process for contracting, no longer does it have to be lowest bid it s going to be on best value, not lowest price. reporter: congressman ed royce says the house foreign affairs committee just passed legislation that would beef up embassy security. harris? wendell, thank you very much. a story that s been shaping up all day. we ll bring you more news as it warrants. again, when we talk about protecting our diplomatic facilities in the middle east and north africa, benghazi comes to mind immediately. we re still trying to find out exactly what happened the night our ambassador and three other americans were killed on september 11th of last year. now there s word the government troyed to keep some cia employees from telling us their stories about that night. james rosen live in our d.c. newsroom now. james in. harris, good evening. one cia source tells fox news sensitivity to possible press leaks about benghazi runs so strong at the top echelons o
james, paul says bad. you say good? well, in terms of the environment and human health, definitely good. because of nuclear power, we do not have many of the alleged environmental harms that have been asserted by paul. for example, not only in the u.s. but around the world, there have been nuclear power plants in operation for decades. the only significant nuclear event was in chernobyl. that s comparing apples to oranges because the system there is entirely different than western systems. what we re looking at in japan, we have the worst possible scenario compounded on itself and we re still unlikely to see any significant human toll as a result. compare that, for example, for the number of humans that die on u.s. highways every day, which is about a hundred. talk about comparing apples to oranges. humans dying on highways have nothing to do with humans dying of nuclear exposure. paul, being fair, we re a demanding world. we want cheap and plentiful