fall of next year. it is an eir and eis. if work were to begin, one question i would have is, what with the impact in terms of canada and the america s cup? scheduling the america s cup? would that be calculated in the phasing of the work? the first phase of construction would begin in 2014, although that is not a hard date. any other questions or comments? thank you, dan. item nine b 9b. informational presentation on the lease and development of seawall lot 337 and pier 48 bounded by china basin channel, third street, mission rock street, and san francisco bay. good afternoon, madam president, commissioners. port project manager for the sea wall lot 337 development project coming here and provide an update on our project to move from years ago rfq/rfp process to a recently approved exclusive negotiation agreement to meet the benchmark requirements as outlined in the agreement. last september, the port entered into a mixed use development agreement with the 16-a
settings aside for portions of the edges for public access purposes. some quick sketches for the possibilities of this promenade, the kinds of used to treasure island, your bobwhite island, bringing people to this portion of the ferry plaza. and again, looking to the south, the bay bridge, the opportunity that are created for sitting, of viewing, interpreted information, for the ferry terminal expansion. lastly, as we create this additional space that we need for circulation and for emergency response, we also have the opportunity on other occasions to use it for a variety of formal and informal functions, even for a potential expansion of the farmers market. all of those are still under consideration. also, there are opportunities for creating a more pleasant environment and a more civic- kind of space without losing any of the flexibility for both the functional requirements of very access ferry access, and emergency response, as well as other activities. in the end, all
perimeter access next to golden gate, fplp, ferry building, along the bay that would be for pedestrian purposes. then on weekend days, certainly, both the east ferry plaza promenade, and south promenade, would become significant connections that would enhance. these sections are small, but in your materials, it shows settings aside for portions of the edges for public access purposes. some quick sketches for the possibilities of this promenade, the kinds of used to treasure island, your bobwhite island, bringing people to this portion of the ferry plaza. and again, looking to the south, the bay bridge, the opportunity that are created for sitting, of viewing, interpreted information, for the ferry terminal expansion. lastly, as we create this additional space that we need for circulation and for emergency response, we also have the opportunity on other occasions to use it for a variety of formal and informal functions, even for a potential expansion of the farmers market. al
would that be calculated in the phasing of the work? the first phase of construction would begin in 2014, although that is not a hard date. any other questions or comments? thank you, dan. item nine b 9b. informational presentation on the lease and development of seawall lot 337 and pier 48 bounded by china basin channel, third street, mission rock street, and san francisco bay. good afternoon, madam president, commissioners. port project manager for the sea wall lot 337 development project coming here and provide an update on our project to move from years ago rfq/rfp process to a recently approved exclusive negotiation agreement to meet the benchmark requirements as outlined in the agreement. last september, the port entered into a mixed use development agreement with the 16-acre site, steve a lot 337, immediately south of the at&t park on third street at mission rock street. it is currently used as service parking. the site for this project also a includespier 48
berkeley and richmond, which could trigger when gate e is constructed. we are looking at converting gate e, the one that held oakland, to its more treasure island service because of its direct route. we will have more space for the amlarger amount of queuing. and to move in alameda and oakland to gate f. g will serve as spare birth and for other things to come along at a later time, particularly in the south bay. one of the and brother improvements we are looking at is we may need to enhance the service to treasure island to load vessels without turning around. they go back and forth. they would be quicker and handle more passengers. gate e can be fitted to the new vessels, if the plan warns that improvement. it is already sized where it will serve with the side-loading birth but would also, the balloting. one of the things that we have all looked at here, as we did in phase one, was to make sure the improvements that are being made in hansard, in fact, future renovation and