This is a genuine porsche you can tell from 1st glance and yes its different somehow its called the tag contrave o. S. Its drive doesnt need a turbo because its purely electric. Eye and a fully electric porsche is by no means a new idea explains in mine a well as early as 898 fair number 4 show launched the loaner seemed to fade ton the 1st electric porsche shortly thereafter this was developed as a hybrid back to the 1st electric porsche it had about 3. 00 to 5. 00 horsepower and a top speed of 25 Kilometers Per Hour at over 2 times and was very heavy by the reason why Ferdinand Porsche turned away from electric mobility for a long time the concept of the mobility was abandoned it was only over 100 years later with the development of lithium ion batteries suitable for cars that electro mobility steam. To return now lets have a look at what electra mobility has to offer namely a porsche tai con turbo is what we need to be a name if that paul told. The terminal and this is the top model
Im worried were talking past each other between the recommendation and the proposed recommendation certainly. As we look to the number of the ethnics laws and Campaign Laws and things of that nature we thought about how we terminator them and think about how their trermentd we often look to the statements of purpose that were put into the laws and things to e things of that nature. Proposal j had this concept of reich what people, you know, in terms of if someone was getting a Public Benefit from the city and this could be a zoning change or a contract, it could be a lot of things were restricted from giving Campaign Donations to officials that decide on that benefit. So it was an interesting campfire concept from an implementation standpoint but there were a number the recommendations we listed them in the report. Im trying to find the right place i know we have a whole thing on 7 and 27. 78 you have the actual ballot measure on 78. We have a finding that d disposition of interests it
Seems like its not responding to the recommendation i mean that be directed to the mayor and the board of supervisors if that he direct it to the to court we should provide it to them but it is nonresponsive as written in my view. I would propose an amendment in the mayor or board makes a request i ask we comply with it. On 25 the recommendation i mean, i think to see what commissioner keanes comments that is sort of apple pie here, of course, if we had the resources shouldnt we do the things that be suggested in recommendation 25 . And so i would change the recommendation to say provide with sufficient resources the commission could and would do the work do more work as indicated by the findings of something to the effect. Any comments from the commissioners . Is there a motion to amend 24, 25 as proposed by commissioner keane and commissioner hur . Yes. So moved. Second. Second. Public comment . A couple of comments on 24 t it is where the grand jury made a recommendation go you shou
Report that is helpful to the public here are the requirements those are new and those are not new andtolysis will the one pending it could be an important part of the legislation i would ask you to do an unanimous report we know find nothing that was recorded to the board of supervisors in terms of the effectiveness of the laws and what was happening with them. Id again saying its worthwhile to think about an annual report. Thanks larry bush from the civil grand jury just to clarify this is not the not to my knowledge report this is a special report specified in the charter you are to report to the board and mayor on the focusness of San Francisco ethnics laws there are issues having to do this and theyve not been recorded for example, of the march 2008 memo outlining the problems you found and adapting new policies about enforcement is an example never report to the board or public. In which changed the enforcement policies of the department. So i think it would be a really good idea
Commissioner keane yes. Mr. Chair for the language on page 16 recommendation 25 in the middle of the paragraph the director notes id change that to the commission notes. Anything else . I would i have a couple of amendments on 24 on the recommendation it is sort of seems like its not responding to the recommendation i mean that be directed to the mayor and the board of supervisors if that he direct it to the to court we should provide it to them but it is nonresponsive as written in my view. I would propose an amendment in the mayor or board makes a request i ask we comply with it. On 25 the recommendation i mean, i think to see what commissioner keanes comments that is sort of apple pie here, of course, if we had the resources shouldnt we do the things that be suggested in recommendation 25 . And so i would change the recommendation to say provide with sufficient resources the commission could and would do the work do more work as indicated by the findings of something to the effect.