signal and then intercept your voice communications. if it s operating near the white house, in some of the buildings or hotels out there, then what you have is a situation where donald trump s relatively unsecured cell phone and texts are being intercepted and monitored outside what is known in the public realm. if that s possible, given your experience inside the government, i mean isn t there some way to escalate and thwart that and better fortify the president s phones? well, first off, we certainly can do electronic countermeasures against these systems. but what generally happens is that you track them down, and you realize that they are inside a foreign embassy or a building which is the sovereign property of another nation. you can try to jam those signals, but then you start jamming cell towers in your own area. the easiest thing to do is to give the president a secure piece of communications, which is tempest controlled so that it s not emitting signals all over the place
for many foreign intelligence services, including geopolitical rivals like russia and china. joined now by malcolm nance, an msnbc counterintelligence. what does this story mean and do you see it relating to russia? well, the significance of this story, because it s been reported on before, is that now we ve gotten confirmation through the congress that there may be very sophisticated stingray technology. these systems that actually capture your cell phone signal by pretending to be a cell phone tower and can downgrade your signal and then intercept your voice communications. if it s operating near the white house, in some of the buildings or hotels out there, then what you have is a situation where donald trump s relatively unsecured cell phone and texts are being intercepted and monitored outside what is known in the public realm. if that s possible, given
access to the apache on board cameras and voice communications. all their requests are denied. the government makes no further comment on the incident until three years later when wikileaks, which had received a leaked copy of the classified video, releases it under the provocative title collateral murder. the video is important in a number of ways. one of them is better scrutiny of how pilots behave when they fire on people. they released it in a couple different forms. they released it both in a long form, then a more concise form where the high points, if you will, were highlighted during the incident. the effect of that release was devastating. the u.s. military is trying to explain a newly leaked video that shows apache helicopters killing civilians during a 2007 raid in iraq. ethan mccord has just dropped off his children at school when he gets the news. came home.
it also specifically requests access to the apache on board cameras and voice communications. all their requests are denied. the government makes no further comment on the incident until three years later when wikileaks, which had received a leaked copy of the classified video, releases it under the provocative title collateral murder. the video is important in a number of ways. one of them is better scrutiny of how pilots behave when they fire on people. they released it in a couple different forms. they released it both in a long form, then a more concise form where the high points, if you will, were highlighted during the incident. the effect of that release was devastating. the u.s. military is trying to explain a newly leaked video that shows apache helicopters killing civilians during a 2007 raid in iraq. ethan mccord has just dropped off his children at school when he gets the news.
access to the apache on board cameras and voice communications. highlighted the u.s. military is trying to explain a newly leaked video that shows apache helicopters killing civilians in a 2007 raid in iraq. ethan mcchord has just dropped off his children at school when he gets the news.