intellectual property should not be in the hands of other countries. we don t think particularly of them as a huge warring rival or anything like that, but it s the principle of it, and i think that worries once it s out of our hands, you don t know how safe it is in their hands, as well, with the rest of the international community acting in terms of spying and espionage, and so on. so it s worrying, the government have said they will be looking at this, but when they look at it and it goes through, a lot of money is spent. then we live with the consequences of it. so money is spent. then we live with the consequences of it. the consequences of it. so no government the consequences of it. so no government intervention - the consequences of it. so no l government intervention there. finally the times, push for hydrogen will increase household bills. in the first iteration of the paper you seemed ok with that? i think we need to look at our energy use. think we need to look at ou
all over. claimed dozens of lives, wildfires all over, the west of north america - we all over, the west of north america - we had all over, the west of north america - we had to all over, the west of north america we had to accept the fact that we are living we had to accept the fact that we are living in we had to accept the fact that we are living in a changing climate. this story are living in a changing climate. this story is about decarbonisation, the government s plans to get a third the government s plans to get a third of the government s plans to get a third of our energy use from hydrogen, which produces no carbon when hydrogen, which produces no carbon when it s hydrogen, which produces no carbon when it s burned, but it s carbon footprint when it s burned, but it s carbon footprint depends on how it s produced. nobody wants their bills to go produced. nobody wants their bills to go up. produced. nobody wants their bills to go up, but i think w