environment. climate change, as well as their healthcare programs. they want to keep them going while she runs for president and possibly becomes president. they want that foundation to be up and operating and maybe bill clinton will run it if she were to be elected. that s something that probably will become a campaign issue for sure because she continues to accept the money now, she has limited it to six countries for the main part of the foundation. the health initiative will be able to receive money from many more countries. okay, the but the problem is that many of the foundation s biggest donors are actually foreigners that are legally barred from making convictions to the united states presidential candidate. so how are they going to reconcile this very troubling ethical question and escape the fact that it wreaks of influence pedaling? well, that s the balance they are trying to strike by limiting it to the six countries that they have
materials recovered from the victim s body at the time of the autopsy. one hair, not hairs. one hair. it was merely another hair in the bedroom. of mrs. edwards. this is a completely different case than what the jury heard. in the final analysis, the question really is if not now, when? if this is not enough to grant somebody a new trial, then when is post conviction relief ever appropriate? unexpectedly, rather than adjourn and read the filings before ruling, the judge issued his decision on the spot. all motions are denied. the judge said, one hair is not enough. i m out of here. in this case, there are a number of things that stink and if you look at it as a whole, it doesn t just stink, it wreaks. an execution date was set for elmore. he was placed in a high security lockdown cell while awaiting his
african-american descent. he acknowledged the evidence should have been given to the defense but argued only one of the hairs had sufficient dna to read. we do not dispute the materials from the victim s body at the time of the autopsy. one hair, not hairs. one hair. it was merely another hair in the bedroom. this is a completely different case than what the jury heard. in the final analysis, the question really is if not now, when? if this is not enough to grant somebody a new trial, then when is post conviction relief ever appropriate? unexpectedly, rather than adjourn and read the filings before ruling, the judge issued his decision on the spot. all motions are denied. the judge said, one hair is not enough. i m out of here. in this case, there are a number of things that stink and if you look at it as a whole, it doesn t just stink, it wreaks.
more kids dropping out of school. it wreaks havoc an our country. what about giving that harsh mandatory 10 to 20. they are putting a lot of these guys away for a long period of time. does the crime fit the punishment? i believe it does. i believe it does. i have a support group of families who have lost children i get calls from moms. you i can t believe the cries. i have never heard sounds like this. are they angry with the pushers? the first thing they want do is get their hands on the drug dealer. i thought that was prevailing wisdom but you disagree with me and ms. cats and there are others who feel the way that you do that you shouldn t put these drug pushers in jail. and why do you feel that way? i adamantly disagree with you, bill, i think our drug sentences are harsh enough draconian enough. we incarcerate so many people in our country and most of them for minor possession charges. bill: that s not true
more kids dropping out of school. it wreaks havoc an our country. what about giving that harsh mandatory 10 to 20. they are putting a lot of these guys away for a long period of time. does the crime fit the punishment? i believe it does. i believe it does. i have a support group of families who have lost children i get calls from moms. you i can t believe the cries. i have never heard sounds like this. are they angry with the pushers? the first thing they want do is get their hands on the drug dealer. i thought that was prevailing wisdom but you disagree with me and ms. cats and there are others who feel the way that you do that you shouldn t put these drug pushers in jail. and why do you feel that way? i adamantly disagree with you, bill, i think our drug sentences are harsh enough draconian enough. we incarcerate so many people in our country and most of them for minor possession charges. bill: that s not true