congressional notification before any of these back handed deals were made. to say now it was because of his health or some other reason they had to bypass congress, shame on the administration for doing. this at that classified briefing we were very clear no, heck no we should not do this. and they we hear you loud and clear. so much for that. we only have about 40 seconds left. so now what? let s assume that they just did it because they didn t think they would get permission from congress. so now what? i don t think they thought that i think that they played this out wrongly. they thought it was going to be a feel good story. and what you have seen is the congressional opposition has been pretty fierce and nothing that i have seen so far has made me change my mind. it was a bad decision two years ago. it was still a bad decision today. even more so. so what happens though? well, i think that we re going to have congressional hearings. i think we are going to have the agenc
it s very puzzling as to why they didn t notify anybody in congress as to what was going on. senator, was the proof of life video shown inside the classified briefing? it was. and i hope they release that because it s not a very long video and, frankly, it s not an indication, greta, of what i expected to see because what we were told is the administration made a determination that the health of sergeant bergdahl had deteriorated so such a point to where his life was in danger and there is no way to determine that from looking at that very brief video. he was obviously drugged and
weekend to suggest that he was not just a prisoner of war with you that he had served with honor and distinction when in fact there are other facts and allegations. brings to mind appearances. imus in the morning on fox business. maybe susan rice shouldn t be on the sunday shows anymore. ed, thank you, especially thank you because i know it s late in brussels. thank you, ed. congress slamming the obama administration for not warning them about fans to release five terror leaders. representative peter king says the president seems awful casual about hardened killers. congressman king is not the only one who is steamed. totally not following the law. i believe he bypassed congress because this was done for political reasons. what the president decided to do was ignore a process that s been in place to keep us all safe. from the opportunity presentd itself and we could successfully recover him we acted quickly to do so. we should have been
this is the one that can make things happen. so, in effect the afghan taliban has a chit with them. we gave you the american, you cut a deal, you owe us. that s how it works in that part of the world. is there any reason to be confident that we didn t do both? i mean everyone is talking about. that s an excellent point. it s entirely possible. that s the one thing the administration has not ruled out is that money was exchanged in this deal as well. we don t know the answer for that. we will keep digging for that one. thank you. thank you. the white house has a familiar problem on its hands trying to talk its way out of a national security advisor susan rice botched talking points. yes, first benghazi. now, rice has done it again. served the united states with honor and distinction. sergeant bergdahl wasn t simply a hostage he was an american prisoner of war captured on the battlefield. it wasn t unknown to congress we also had indications that his health was growing more f
could mean less waiting for things like security backups and file downloads you d take that test, right? well, what are you waiting for? you could literally be done with the test by now. now you could have done it twice. this is awkward. check your speed. see how fast your internet can be. switch now and add voice and tv for $34.90. comcast business built for business. new information about how level briefings dating back to 0011. briefings about a possible soldier swap with robertberg dal. thank you, greta. take me back to the first time it was suggested to congress that there be some sort of swap or deal. were you opposed to it? if so, why? and the only reason i m talking about it now is because the press reports have already come out about that meeting and, in fact,