an interim. that s one of the things that interest me. affair is one thing. people have affairs and it is what it is. i hadn t realized about the catch and kill thing. which ami says they don t do. come on. they interviewed employees who said that s something they do. yeah. i agree with governor. this is first of all i couldn t take my eyes off it. it was such a compelling interview. and she because she was so this is going to sound maybe weird. she was very relatable. she was relatable. just as a human. not in terms of what she did. a human being. because she gave some honest answers about feeling guilty. and came across as somebody who was sympathetic in that way. certainly there are people who will say there s no sympathy here. you were a misstress. and you were messing around with a married man.
why she s mad about that. she feels like she was it was under handed. you believe the affair itself was existed when she was, she had very specific. she knew his number and the name of his assistant and specific dates. i don t think there s a question about that. to me, the fact that ami did this catch and kill thing is a real question about whether this is an contribution to the campaign. and that issue is obviously before the fec which is a problem. that s not going anywhere. and the only other recourse on the campaign finance thing whether is this a violation, is it illegal? did the team act illegally. or ami give a contribution lix like that. that has to be resolved through the department of justice. who s the u.s. attorney? it s appointed by jeff sessions.
number, the name of his assistant. specific dates. i don t think there s a question about that. the fact that ami did this catch and kill thing is a real question about whether this is a contribution to the campaign. that issue is before the fec which is a problem because that s probably not going anywhere. the only other recourse on the campaign finance thing whether is this a violation. is it illegal. did the president act illegally or his team or ami give a contribution like that. that s to be resolved through the department of justice that would mean the u.s. attorney in los angeles would have to file some sort of action. who is the u.s. state s attorney? it s appointed by jeff session. that s one of the things that interest me. affairs is one thing. people have affairs and it is what it is.
did he not believe it was true that this was happened. he believed that was credible. i think she s much less credible on why she s going on television. we have not been able to confirm that call. that s a good point. i think on the question of why she did this interview, given the fact and you were saying she said she signed the agreement with ami because she wanted to kill the story. it wasn t catch and kill in the way we have been led to believe. she wanted to have it killed. that s part of the deal. why she has turned around like this, there are many different explanations. i think though that, listen, there s a certain repugnance to all this and it ain t going to help. i think you ve got series of
was very credible. on the relationship. the details. and very importantly the fact her lawyer called the president s lawyer. he wouldn t have made that call did he not believe it was absolutely true this is what happened. he believed there was credible. i think she s much less credible on why she s going on tv. she said that s what she read. we have confirmed that call between keith davidson that s a good point. i think on the question of why she did this interview, given the fact as you were saying. she said she signed the agreement. with ami. because she wanted to kill the story. it wasn t catch and kill in the way we have been led to believe. she wanted it killed and said that s part of the deal. why she s turned around like this. there are many explanations. i think there s a certain repugnance. i don t know how it will play