He is giving a speech to the people of poland. This is his first major remarks in a city overseas outdoors to a group like this. And we have seen some excerpts already. Its a fairly lofty sweefrpeech. He will talk about how people in the west succeeded now because of paper and regulations, but because they had the ability to chase their dreams. And let me ask you about a point that stuck out to me and i know youve covered the white house and you saw him on the campaign trail. He also tried to cast a little bit of doubt about the credibility of the Intelligence Assessment that russia was interfering. You pushed him hard to say that the 17 Intelligence Agencies were the ones that came out and said that they believe russia was definitively behind it. It seemed he once again reverted back to the Campaign Rhetoric where he would say well, we look the ed its only three
the g20 summit where that big meeting will happen. We know that the two at least russia wants to talk about the situation in
the unanimous view of the american intelligence agencies that russia did interfere in our election. i said it very simply. i think it could very well have been russia, but i think it could well have been other countries. and i won t be specific, but i think a lot of people interfere. i think it s been happening for a long time. it s been happening for many, many years. you again say you think it was russia. your intelligence agencies have been far more definitive. they say it was russia. why won t you agree with them and say it was? well, let me just start off by saying, i heard it was 17 agencies. i said, boy, that s a lot. do we even have that many intelligence agents? let s check it. we did some heavy research. it turned out to be three or four. it wasn t 17. and many of your compatriots had to change their reporting and they had to apologize, and they had to correct. now, with that being said, mistakes have been made. i agree, i think it was russia, but i think it was probabl
it turned out to be three or four. it wasn t 17. and many of your compatriots had to change their reporting and they had to apologize, and they had to correct. now, with that being said, mistakes have been made. i agree, i think it was russia, but i think it was probably other people and/or countries. and i see nothing wrong with that statement. nobody really knows. president trump had no harsh words for vladimir putin, who directed directed the russian interference into our election, and instead he managed to blame president obama for the russian interference in our election. the thing i have to mention is that barack obama, when he was president, found out about this in tirms of if it were russia, found out about it in august. now, the election was in november. that s a lot of time. he did nothing about it. why did he do nothing about it? he was told it was russia by the
i heard it was 17 agencies, that s a lot. do we even have that many intelligence agencies? it turned out to be three or four. it wasn t 17. with that being said, mistakes have been made. what cnn did was unfortunate for them. they have been fake news for a long time. that was excellent swiping everybody in one felg swoop. that brings me to my next guest, a columnist for the washington post and served as senior official on international trade in the clinton administration and penned the greatest threat facing the united stat.s. is it president. nice to be here. you say something in the article which is relevant to meeting taking place tomorrow, the first meeting between president trump and president pulten. he is a disciplined individual, spent many years at the highest levels of russia s intelligence gathering and head of russia. you write this, if a dedicated enemy of the united states an opportunist such as putin
the report. i want to play, if i can, some of the president s comments because he implied in his statements that there was disagreement within the intelligence community as well as making other accusations. let s have a quick listen. you again state you think it was russia. your intelligence agencies have been far more definitive. they say it was russia. why won t you agree with them and say it was? let me start off by saying i heard it was 17 agencies. i said that is a lot. do we have that many intelligence agencies? let s check it. we did very heavy research. it turned out to be three or four. it wasn t 17. many of your compatriots had to change reporting and apologize and correct. with that being said, mistakes have been made. i agree. i think it was russia, but i think it was probably other people and/or countries. and i see nothing wrong with that statement. nobody really knows.