inseparable. then one ended up missing. nobody s heard from her. nobody knows where she is. something s wrong. something s bad wrong. where was skylar? someone was hiding something. it was the fbi. they were serious. twitter, instagram, facebook. you just see things start to get ridiculously out of control. a clique of mean girls. were they mean enough to kill? she was like, well, she ll blackmail me. it was such a shocking and scandalous kind of case. this was diabolical. evil comes in all shapes and sizes. hello and welcome to dateline. for skylar neese s parents their teenage daughter was all they could have hoped for. a straight-a student with lots of friends and happy at her part-time job. but then their world turned upside down when their only child seemed to vanish without a trace. at first police thought she ran away. but hints on social media would point to a more sinister reason for her disappearance. here s andrea canning with something w
that s not an extreme way of framing it. this is exactly what we re seeing. you want to read more from the opinion. the judge writing, the law does not mandate any specific type of medical treatment let alone abortion. especially when the law was equal stabilization obligations. that phrasing seems very dangerous. it s specific. it wasn t an accident. so their end goal here is to ensure that people who are pregnant have fewer rights than a fetus. so that s why they are using the word equality here. i just want i know you look surprised, but i want to be clear here. that isn t a new goal. that is why they are coming after contraception. it s why they have long standing efforts to ensure that people can t get the care that they need. it s been a strategy. this strategy of encapsulating constitutional rights and embryos and fetuses has been an antiabortion strategy for some
media three to five times. two, state his positive vision for america. two or three times. three, amer vivek ramaswamy. and defend donald trump to an attack from chris christie. this is so weird that this got dropped. do you think this was a mistake and this was meant for the candidate only? and then also it seems so formulaic and just not natural. which is what he is being accused of. it wasn t an accident. there is rules about super pacs not being able to coordinate with candidates. instead of coordinating quietly behind closed doors they dump the memos in the public so the people they are rooting for can see them. i guess the advice i would give to everyone on that debate stage is none of your voters, none of your base republican voters are interested in hearing you beat each other up and take pot shots. the base republican voter cares about two things. what will you do to beat joe biden and what would you do to
children to make them believe that slavery was a good thing. and i wonder for what reason. can you speculate on why they want black children to believe that slavery was good? i can t speculate on why they re doing this. but i also can tell you that you see what s happening in florida and across the country of this narrative that s being pushed. it s really because this is not a policy issue. this is a power struggle that we re seeing right now. this isn t just about the rewriting of history. florida is trying to wipe away anything that contradicts the carefully crafted narrative that desantis is creating and that includes black history. here s my thing. so desantis doesn t want teachers to teach black history in the classroom, then i ll put my teaching hat on for two seconds and do it recognize here. it wasn t an accident that vice president harris chose jacksonville to do her visit. that s a historically black
pop up here and there. we saw in the indictment about bedminster and the writing of a book, and journalists being present, even aipac person like susie wildes. like, it s a kind of stuff we think jack smith would have beaten already? he might. katie, it could be valuable. as what you know, it s for a four b evidence. evidence of the persons common scheme or plan. even if he doesn t charge it, you can use that as evidence to show that trump is very reckless on he handles classified information. so, every piece of evidence brings value. yeah, in that evidentiary rule would allow the prosecution to basically say it wasn t a mistake, right? it wasn t an accident or mistake on the part of trump. it s part of what he does. it s a part of his motive and his modus operandi. barbara mcquade, as always, i appreciate you being here. thank you for joining us this morning. thank you, katie. coming up next, abortion desert. health care workers are warning the accelerating abortion bans