was the data akar system turned off by a human hand? did it bank, turn? was ate pilot or human hand that did that, as opposed to was it spiralling into the sea. if those things were turn bade human hand, it would indicate more toward a cockpit takeover. we can add to that today as nbc news reported today that united states satellites, infrared specialized satellites did not detect an explosion in the air, and likely they would have. they re very sensitive, and apparently they can detect things like that. so if there was no explosion in the air that was detected, then either there are some that saying is it terrorist, but there has been no terrorist group that has come forward to take credit. and usually terrorists do things to send a message. and there has been no message. then with those two shelved, or at least we think we can shelve
nation s spy agency. it shows the warrant less surveillance program is doing good as evidence against a terror suspect who has been busted. this could now open the door for a legal challenge that could land the controversial program directly in front of the supreme court. it might take awhile, but these things take awhile. the defense attorney and former prosecutor who is a defense attorney as well, if you are the defense attorney for this suspected it terrorist, the first motion you are going to make is to suppress evidence because you say, your honor, it was illegally obtained x right? there is no doubt. that s the first step. since the government has told you, they never said this before. they got information from the warrant less surveillance program. now you say, well you get thousand they have told the defendant this and they get to challenge how they got the information. that would be a motion to suppress. this information was illegally obtained. i see, doug, two defense
greater than we thought says an nsa official. originally the agency claimed they would look at data two hops away from a suspected it terrorist. this is confusing. but in testimony on wednesday, the deputy director says the standard was two or three hops. apparently a hop is a degree of separation. one hop is all of the people the terror suspect communicated with and two hops are all of those people that those people communicated with. this is really boring. beginning to second guess why we did this story. oh yes. it was a slow news day. these are the only hops i care about. you know, i have been saying this since the whole gay marriage thing, what is next is women dancing with
beyond verizon. but in this case, certainly it is large in scope just involving verizon. you are talking about millions of customers. so because of that, millions upon millions of phone calls, the information of which would be monitored by the nsa in this fbi requested top secret order. some people might look at this and say if the under surveillance allowed them to the put a act, to the patriot october, why is it terrorist related? o. reporter: well, the law provided for this fisa court, foreign intelligence act court. it s a top process establish and reviewed under the bush administration because there were privacy concerns. what it does, it allows there to be some judicial oversight of exactly tease requests, wire tanks that kind of thing, but it allows for there to be a judge that can have input in it but also keep it quiet because it is a matter of national security.
is it terrorist to say you hope it is a white person. no, that only goes one way. a leftist can project his own racism and get away with it if andrew brightbar was alive today he would have died laughing reading the comum . you might have a photoof david sarota throwing a jab . i think brightbar was great. he found there nothing funnier, that is amazing. there is nothing funnier than someone who takes themselves seriously. no one would pick that picture. it plays off an anti-american sentiment. sirota believes that america can t handle anything but a white terrorist and somehow be thrown in a wild back lash and