the tabloids went to great lengths to silence her and others and they are attempting to silence her westbound again with the absurd claim that the free speech was violated let s not oversell this. let s not call them brave truth tellers. these were women who had one night stands arriva. i m all in support the claems and what not let s make them the incredible powerful women. they went against the president of the united states of america. we have a porn star and a nude model. i mean a bunny. i m not disparaging. i m not disparaging but let s not make them more than they they are brave strong american women. i think they are brave. they had sex with a guy. i think they are brave because they are taking on the cht of the united states. and it takes a lot of courage to file a lawsuit ever owe and to be in a lawsuit against the president who has unlimited resources. you know there is an imbalance of power when a woman sues a
conversations with gates, failing to turn over e-mails to mueller s team back in february. are we expected to learn more about the contents of those e-mails, do you think? there is a lot we don t know. what we know is how doggedly the mueller team is tracking down a lot of the b.s. stories frankly. we saw it with george papadopoulos. that s the canary in the coal mine. he lied. they interviewed him in february. he lied. in july, they pulled him off a plane. they subpoenaed facebook and skype logs. he came around and now he is a cooping witness. as long as they re able to follow the evidence, subpoena bank records, communications records and go back at witnesses, as you just mentioned are so willing to lie through their teeth to protect the president. that s the way to the truth. that s not what we did on the house intelligence investigation
polling numbers he has the worst numbers 18 months in of any president in the history of polling. that s some mean accomplishment there. there has to be a democratic reaction to it. the question is will we be in the same situation in the mid-terms in november. well, if the i think the economy a lot of that depends on the economy, right? and we ll see. i got to get to some other stuff here, china slapping $3 billion tariffs on 120 u.s. products in retaliation to the president s tariffs. i want to you look at this. china revenge move so far targeted products made in the heartland states which of course is home to many trump voters. and what point do you think they ll push back against this? or will they? well this is interesting. in some whiches i think it s the
but you are seeing sign of surge in this election on the democratic side. there is energy there. one of the things the internet has done is democratize fund-raising. it s easier for a candidate running for congress to raise national money if you have a hook from low dollar donors. that s really what digital fund-raising does for you. we don t know what s happening in the mid-terms. but the signs are there of tremendous democratic energy. you see it in the turn out in the special elections. you see it in the number of candidates running. and now you see it in grass roots fund raising across the board. i don t know there is a democratic wave. but all the early conditions that would accompany a democratic wave, intense city turnout, interest from younger voters, it s all there. this is another thing you put in the pile of evidence that a lot of democratic pressure is building. if you look at the president s
that. yeah. i agree with michael moore. the issue though, too, is that typically prosecutors inform persons about whom they re going to gather evidence or take an interview from if they are a target. there is usually an affirmative obligation to say if you are a target. saying you are not a target is again standard prosecutorial blocking and tackling. if you are bringing them into the grand jury. especially. that s right. so i think those things may be may be down the road. corrupt intent, the article talked about a corrupt intent here. because according to the report mueller is pushing hard to interview president trump to determine if the president had any corrupt intent. so what how is that determined, michael moore? kidding. go ahead, michael moore. well, i mean, clearly they are talking about what was his state of mind at the time he was fired. they ll go back through the rosenstein memo prepared after the fact. he is talking to him about the