label that is a disservice to the 37,000 men and women who work at the f.b.i. who i think tackle their jobs with professionalism and rigor, with objectivity and with courage. so that s not a term i would ever use to describe our workforce. and i think it s an affront to them. the president this morning on twitter criticizing christopher wray. he wrote i don t know what report current director of the f.b.i. christopher wray was reading. it sure wasn t the one given to me. with that kind of attitude he will never be able to fix the f.b.i. which is badly broken despite having some of the greatest men and women working there. many f.b.i. agents would take issue with the president s characterization saying that there were some errors, yes, but the overall mission of the f.b.i. is a positive mission and there are hard working people there. attorney general bill barr at the d.o.j. will be speaking at a forum in washington today on
live as a good citizen. so do the chinese. so do the russians. so do the middle eastern countries. but we are globalized. we cannot change that back. laura: we have to figure out how to be good global citizens? that might sound really high-minded. what happened in the 20 years since china entered the wto is not pretty. we ended up enriching other countries and lots of wall street-ers like cohn himself as our own middle-class suffered. thousands of u.s. companies moved overseas for cheaper production, all ushered in under the banner of globalization. gone were most american-made products, textiles, toys, televisions. it sure wasn t what the globalist told us what happened once china was welcomed into the world trade community. by joining the wto, china is not simply agreeing to import more of our products. it is agreeing to impart one of democracy s most cherished values: economic freedom. the more china liberalizes its economy, the more fully it will
we have to figure out how to live as a good citizen. so do the chinese. so do the russians. sort of the middle eastern countries. but we are globalized. we cannot change that back. laura: we have to figure out how to be good global citizens? that might sound really high-minded. what happened in the 20 years since china entered the wto is not pretty. we ended up enriching other countries and lots of lost traders like gary cohn himself as our own middle-class suffere. thousands of u.s. companies moved overseas for cheaper production, all ushered in under the banner of globalization. gone were most american-made products, textiles, toys, televisions. it sure wasn t what the globalist told us what happened once china was welcomed into the world trade community. by joining the wto, china is not simply agreeing to import more of our products. it is agreeing to impart one of democracy s most cherished values: economic freedom. the more china liberalized its
report. anybody who reads that might have done a double take yesterday, the headline can republicans win without hillary. what do you mean? i don t know who the democrats could have dominated, who would have beaten donald trump. it sure wasn t hillary clinton. donald trump was the standards of presidential nominees very unpopular and little trusted by the electorate. he was lucky, he ran in the same year that the person was the least liked and least trusted of any nominee in modern history was running on the other side. it s important to remember, yeah, trump nation, the trump train, that intensity was really valuable. but don t underestimate the poe ten i si of hillary clinton in motivating republican and moderate leaning voters to get to the polls. if she s not out there, thank god for republicans that she still keeps herself out there, if she s not on the ballot, not running, can republicans still
if mexico pays for it or not. they like the concept of national security when it comes the thinking about the border. you are from arizona, you know better than a lot of people. you do see it differently, where you stand is where you sit. if you are in arizona or a border state you might think about it differently. you don t care who pays for it. yeah, like i said from the beginning if americans want border security they re going to have to pay for it. as a sovereign nation if they want the security on an international border they have to foot the bill. the president making that promise, wasn t exactly helpful. i think he ll probably maybe try to row negotiate that with the nafta issue. i don t know if it s a dead talking appointment. in terms of the realistic goals, there s been a lot of hysteria around president trump s idea for the wall. if you listen to the acting commission e for the border patrol today and the statements he made he s saying all of the suggestions that we are ge