their own words. there s no spin ability. and from the time when this was all happening. what you see is the people on the inside who are working the channels understand that really what comes through all the texts there s only one thing trump cares about that s the investigations. the benefit his own political campaign. it just it comes through from the direct players who are involved and corroborates and backs up and support the calls we have seen. it supports what the whistleblower told us. this is really important evidence. it gives us insight. for those who say we don t need i don t know. you have to have evidence of a crime. or others say what does this say? it helps build the case there is a crime. you do not need a crime in order to impeach. abuse of power is enough. i think we have a crime. this builds the case there was an exchange. bribery. whatever you want to call it. it s darn close to an actual stated quid pro quo. here s the deal.
it s in their own words. there s no spin ability. and from the time when this was all happening. what you see is the people on the inside who are working the channels understand that really what comes through all the texts there s only one thing trump cares about and that s the investigations. the benefit his own political campaign. it just it comes through from the direct players who are involved and corroborates and backs up and support the call we have seen. it supports what the whistleblower told us. this is really important evidence. it gives us insight. for those who say we don t need i don t know. you have to have evidence of a crime. orr others say you don t need a crime. what does it say? it helps build the case there is a crime. you do not need a crime in order to impeach. abuse of power is enough. i think we have a crime. this builds the case there was an exchange. bribery. quid pro quo, whatever you want to call it. it s darn close to an actual stated quid pro quo. he
university, a college. thank you very much. you know pennsylvania. you ve got a sense for the whole thing. hi, chris. what the hell is going on in the 18th which is that appalachian southwestern districts and the democrat could well win. yeah. well, the democrats have come up with the ideal candidate. a former marine and a prosecutor. and he is very pro military in a district that, you know, quite frankly is very much pro military. he s also served as a prosecutor. translation, let s put the bad guys behind bars. and then when you take a look at that district, which is culturally conservative, as i said, it tends to be pro military, pro union. it supports, by the way, the voters in there, particularly the working class voters. the tariff that trump has imposed on aluminum and steel, these are perfect positions for one conor lamb. so he is running. he is the perfect candidate to
service members. wells fargo auto lending division no stranger to legal troubles. wells fargo previously charged as many as 570,000 customers for car insurance they didn t even need. papa johns trying to repair the damage caused by controversial comments about the nfl. papa johns has been an nfl sponsor since 2010. two weeks ago, the ceo blamed the national anthem controversy, the anthem protests, for hurting pizza sales. claiming the controversy was polarizing their customers. that prompted immediate backlash, so now papa johns is apologizing for its divisive statements. papa johns says it supports, quote, the player s movement to create a new platform for change, but also believes that americans, quote, should honor our anthem. do you think that pizza sales were hurt by the nfl controversy? i never really understood the argument, but are they still saying that those protests hurt their sales? it doesn t sound like they re backtracking away from that
strip politics out of interest where can i on the national security issues. this is a matter of congressional committee that s actively investigating the president and his administration. so it s not a matter of i had an obligation, a member of congress, to the share this information with the president. you had an obligation to not communicate with the president at this time. that s what i mean. it s more than a process foul. he went above and beyond to reach out to the president. and marc you make a good point, where s the fbi, where is the intelligence community keeping the president up to speed. that doesn t make what chierm nunes said. he s telling the presidentior ee wrong. doesn t matter. that s politics. whether it supports or doesn t support the president. he should not be communicating directly with him on the investigation while it s going on. who are you? every time i think i have a handle on this story something else happens. our fox news james rosen said there s