the road in the middle of the bridge. the assistant d.a. says this. quote, the defendant may have used that account to make statements while on the bridge it selfthat were inconsistent with his anticipated trial defense. twitter has filed a motion to quash the subpoena claiming that harris owns the tweets, not twitter. it s a claim the judge has already rejected. moreover twitter is now claiming the fourth amendment demands a search warrant not a subpoena. the judge observed this. quote, while the fourth amendment provides protection for our physical homes we do not have a physical home on the internet. he noted that twitter was free to redistribute tweets to anyone at any time for any reason it chooses. what will happen? twitter will likely lose, because in other court cases courts have said a subpoena not a search warrant is sufficient, and tweets, megyn are kind of like bank records, and individual has no right to challenge a subpoena issued to a third party banks. and banks almost