good evening, welcome to the programme, we have got a packed two hours for you this evening. including a special investigation tonight into the execution of an unarmed ukrainian soldier. we will tell you who he was and who was involved. and we will get the thoughts of a formerjudge who sat on the panel of the international criminal court. big developments in scotland today, where police have arrested peter murrell, nicola sturgeon s husband, in connection to the snps fundraising and finances. but we will start with the split screen events we have watching through the day, president zelensy in warsaw, emmanuel macron in beijing. it s his first visit to china in four years. and from a chinese perspective, emmanuel macron is probably the most important politician in europe. it is the french president in particular, who has continued to engage with putin to find a diplomatic solution to this war in ukraine. and they see him as the man who can push the european union towards a mor
nice coordinated action across the country. nice coordinated action across the count . ., ., ~ nice coordinated action across the count . ., ., ,, ., . country. looking at the crime fiuures, country. looking at the crime figures, cybercrime country. looking at the crime figures, cybercrime goes - country. looking at the crime i figures, cybercrime goes under country. looking at the crime - figures, cybercrime goes under the radar and it is a significant problem. could the people who might have had their information put on this website, to be confident that it still won t be used? tia this website, to be confident that it still won t be used? it still won t be used? no is a simle it still won t be used? no is a simple answer. it still won t be used? no is a simple answer. he it still won t be used? no is a simple answer. he could - it still won t be used? no is a. simple answer. he could check whether your information by going onto the dutch website you could tell it if your inf
and what is your view of this particular case s it and what is your view of this particular case - and what is your view of this particular case s it is in fact as clear as it particular case s it is in fact as clear as it can particular case s it is in fact as clear as it can be particular case s it is in fact as clear as it can be in particular case s it is in fact as i clear as it can be in international law clear as it can be in international law you clear as it can be in international law you do clear as it can be in international law. you do not execute a prisoner of war. law. you do not execute a prisoner of war. an law. you do not execute a prisoner of war, an unarmed prisoner of war. if of war, an unarmed prisoner of war. if someone of war, an unarmed prisoner of war. if someone had been fighting but no longer if someone had been fighting but no longer able to fight, you don t execute longer able to fight, you don t execute them. you treat them humanely.
make committed this crime. bfiidea make committed this crime. video which started make committed this crime. video which started our make committed this crime. video which started our investigation - make committed this crime. video which started our investigation is i which started our investigation is of course a crucial piece of evidence. alexander had clearly surrendered. he had been stripped of his weapons, he was compliant, so much so that he was smoking a cigarette. the geneva convention states it is a war crime to kill a prisoner of war who has laid down his arms and surrendered. it states killing or wounding a combatant who had laid down his arms and having no longer means of defence, has surrendered at discretion, is a war crime. tt surrendered at discretion, is a war crime. ., ., . ., ., crime. it intentional execution of the prisoner crime. it intentional execution of the prisoner of crime. it intentional execution of the prisoner of war. crime. it intentional exe