a job ont s been hard. and it s a job that once younyt start, once you love it, it s th very difficult to do anything else because few oth very few or jobs that fill you with such perhaps pride and necessity to do it. so now i ve i ve done all the wars i feel when a war you breaks out, you ve got to beit a there to cover it. and it s important to our ewers. dangeviewers and it s work. and maybe did you ever imagine what happened to you would did happen to do those thoughts go through your head? surrounded by co it erestisng interesting. lleagues who i m surrounded by colleaguesht w who were injured, seven orho aa eight who died over the years. and so i knew it could happen. but did i ve seen it happen.i ev but dier thid i ever think it wd happen to me? no, i m not sure i did. bu i knew the risks. be a little i knew it could happen. but i think there has to ben t. a little element inside. you has to believe it won t. ey and so you make everyo in t precaution and take every precaution
series of brutal attacks.attack. and benjamin hall was workin g around the clock to bring all of us real time information on the ground. here with more on the groundv . he s in kyiv tonight, the capitol of ukraine. hefox s own benjamin hall. benjamin, what s going on to on tonight?night? well, sean, you d have to look back at today and say whatnot an we ve seen is it s a continuation, if not ann escalation of what we ve seenof over the last week, increasingig civilian areas. civilian areas, an inability to geto ge humanitarian aid into these surrounding cities.t rian and an inability for peoplem. get out of them. then just just a few days late on march the 14th, hall was on a fact finding mission on the outskirts of ukraine other wo other journalists, peter and sasha, when they were viciously attacked by russian forces now. and sasha, they were killed kile had hall was left fighting for his life. here s jennifer griffin was j and worried aboutn. our colleagues and b
the deal is. and they have to be very careful to say two things. one, they haven t analyzed all these in detail yet. it s a slow, pain-staking process because they are trying to disaemable and preserve every piece of evidence they can get. any fingerprints along the way so it s a very slow process. but secondly, they want people to know that these are potentially dangerous. just because none have gone off so far doesn t mean if you find another one it might not be the one that works and you should treat it carefully. is it precaution they warn there might be. more or is this an assumption or do they have evidence? no evidence that there are anymore. the postal service person at the news conference said they know of none in the system. the secret service has said they don t et know of any against their protectees. the one that was for dinero was sitting in the office for two days before they realized they