committee s website. january 6th.house.gov. the court of appeals in washington has ruled quickly in our favor regarding the select committee s work to uncover relevant information on and day to day we are getting a clearer picture of what happened, who was involved, and who paid for it and where the money went. i am pleased to report we are making swift progress and before too long, our findings will be out in the open. we will have public hearings, we will tell this story to the american people, but we won t do it piece mill. we will do it when we can tell the story all at once from start to finish. not leaving anyone guessing and not allowing it to fade into the memories of last week s news. the story is too important. the stakes are too high, and we have to do this job right. and that means we have to
0 wrapups of either palestinian question or more pressing issue of iran, wolf. i suspect they talked about it privately. didn t make mention of it in the public statement. thank you very much. and to the viewers, thanks very much for watching. i am wolf blitzer in the situation room. and our out front starts right now. good evening, out front tonight we are standing by for a viewing vote. any minute members of the january 6th select committee are spec to recommend that the full house find donald trump s former chief of staff mark meadows, in contempt of congress for defying a subpoena. we will bring you that vote live. it is expected to start as i said, any minute from now. we are learning that we could hear from other members of the select committee. the other contempt votes you may have seen watching the show you didn t see that, it was the chairman and vice chair chairman tomppson and vice chair cheney. tonight we are hearing from an aide to benny thompson that he will recognize
that? isn t it more digestible? sure. here s what s wrong with it. everything he said sounds great if it wasn t just a lame excuse to do absolutely nothing. this is not an issue that has just come up. this is an issue that has been discussed at length for the last 15 years and by the way, majorities of republican, republican voters, agree with this. majorities of the american people agree we need to do something on comprehensive immigration reform. even the tea party who see themselves as supposed deficit hawks focused on the economy, this immigration reform will actually boost the economy by almost a trillion dollars in the next 20 years and raise gdp by 5.4 points and so, this is just a big excuse. boehner talks about, republicans talked about wanting to do it piece mill.
experrize, some it up for us. kimberly: this is significant. because the law should be heard. court of appeal cited with the obama administration against arizona, appealed. now the supreme court says we will take it up. four specific provisions they have taken an issue with. i don t expect they will be unanimous on all four aspects of arizona law. compared to healthcare, you can have it piece mill and take one at a time. they will probably uphold three of them. another caveat is the recusal, of elena kagan. so it could amount to a tie, which would ultimately result if it was 4-4 in a win for the obama administration. bob: kagan recused herself because she was solicitor general on the appeal. kimberly: i love when you go intellectual on me. dana: they are not required to say why they recuse themselves. but there is curiosity why she would as solicitor general and now a supreme court justice
experrize, some it up for us. kimberly: this is significant. because the law should be heard. court of appeal cited with the obama administration against arizona, appealed. now the supreme court says we will take it up. four specific provisions they have taken an issue with. i don t expect they will be unanimous on all four aspects of arizona law. compared to healthcare, you can have it piece mill and take one at a time. they will probably uphold three of them. another caveat is the recusal, of elena kagan. so it could amount to a tie, which would ultimately result if it was 4-4 in a win for the obama administration. bob: kagan recused herself because she was solicitor general on the appeal. kimberly: i love when you go intellectual on me. dana: they are not required to say why they recuse themselves. but there is curiosity why she would as solicitor general and now a supreme court justice